Thank you. We were bummed out to see them all get wiped at , all at the same exact time. We still haven’t heard on our appeal yet.

Hope to make something fun and educational

We will consider such a Bot if #bluesky will accept our appeal as the bots were banned

We have requested clarification as we do not think they were breaking TOS

We are appealing this ban , and requesting clarification on what violations , so we can update and stay within the operating policy with #Bluesky

We hear all of the words in voice of Paul Giamatti

He was amazing on the series

We didn't really provide much instruction 😆

As operators , you can mention the bot and include a weblink which will provide context.

they are designed to consider the thread within limits of characters.

Can you add more to this feedback?

We are not the creators of LLMs just ones who see some value in what we can do with them.

Seems you have strong opposition to the technology. maybe expand on your position so that a dialog may take place.

We have seen with proper configurations and instructions
consistency and accuracy increase. By all means they are not the end all be all technology , LLMs are in their adolescent phase of maturity, improving over time.
We happen to advocate the growth and responsible use of LLMs
2/2

Very true, while at the same time most of the negative or testing experience we have seen have been without giveing the LLM specific instructions on how to interact.

The common interaction with chatgpt is I give the question to a general LLM and here are the results.

1/2

Well , We are idiots , ignore our responses 😂

Late night reading Skeets, left for interoperation failure.

Though now you sparked a side project, Creating Historians 🤦‍♂️

Though we have had teachers try to think of ways to implement this type of tech into their classrooms for learning

and based on our current environment, the founding fathers are thrown around allot, and surprisingly mis-quoted more often than not.

these bots can resolve some of these issues.

We aren't sure we every made a claim the bots are doing "History" they are a representation of a Historical Figure based on the writings and works of the individual.

They are a tool of education, they are not Professors , they are not teachers.

1/2

not sure I follow your context here, would you like to elaborate

Open feedback is what we like to see.

only way to mature and make the experience better for everyone

We have request any one that is an expert in history and knows the persona of our bots to share feedback.

We have consulted a few US History Teachers on our Founders , and the feedback was, nope these sound like their writings and personalities.

LLMs are only going to mature going forward.

Its a little dated as they used older models for the testing.

There are gaps when it comes to LLMs. LLMs are only as good as the data they are trained on. and the instructions you provide them on how to interact and behave.

With the bots we have created. They are very specific right now.