@ajbus.bsky.social
It's not that deep bruh.
January 2, 2026 at 6:56 PM
It's not that deep bruh.
Reposted
Skilled workers may ride this wave. We can automate our boring tasks, build useful tools, maintain our position. But the primary effect of AI deployment is transferring wealth upward while presenting that transfer as inevitable progress. This is a bargain that will not create anything good for us.
January 2, 2026 at 2:18 PM
Skilled workers may ride this wave. We can automate our boring tasks, build useful tools, maintain our position. But the primary effect of AI deployment is transferring wealth upward while presenting that transfer as inevitable progress. This is a bargain that will not create anything good for us.
Reposted
POSIWID: the purpose of a system is what it does. Intentions are irrelevant. At scale, AI creates dependence, intensifies surveillance, deskills workers and students, extracts value, and concentrates power. It consumes vast electricity and water. It exploits laborers in data processing. Net negative
January 2, 2026 at 2:18 PM
POSIWID: the purpose of a system is what it does. Intentions are irrelevant. At scale, AI creates dependence, intensifies surveillance, deskills workers and students, extracts value, and concentrates power. It consumes vast electricity and water. It exploits laborers in data processing. Net negative
Why does it need to be productive?
January 2, 2026 at 6:38 PM
Why does it need to be productive?
Lol at the amount of people not getting the post or taking it as a slight😆
January 2, 2026 at 6:37 PM
Lol at the amount of people not getting the post or taking it as a slight😆
Lol seahawks fans🤣
December 30, 2025 at 4:07 PM
Lol seahawks fans🤣
Nope. Ridiculous. Do better @bsky.app @support.bsky.team
December 30, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Nope. Ridiculous. Do better @bsky.app @support.bsky.team
This reply is being marked as "sensitive" with the closed eye🤨
December 30, 2025 at 3:56 PM
This reply is being marked as "sensitive" with the closed eye🤨
I agree although we need more parties imo. But my point is to show them that we aren't truly even allowed any candidates outside the box they've put us in.
Then they had the nerve to ask us to show them someone worth voting for. Which brings us full circle, back to the original post.
Then they had the nerve to ask us to show them someone worth voting for. Which brings us full circle, back to the original post.
December 29, 2025 at 10:03 PM
I agree although we need more parties imo. But my point is to show them that we aren't truly even allowed any candidates outside the box they've put us in.
Then they had the nerve to ask us to show them someone worth voting for. Which brings us full circle, back to the original post.
Then they had the nerve to ask us to show them someone worth voting for. Which brings us full circle, back to the original post.
Yes, for Harris/Walz. I can simultaneously understand why it's important to vote against someone like trump but also criticize dems. It's easy, you should try it.
December 29, 2025 at 8:53 PM
Yes, for Harris/Walz. I can simultaneously understand why it's important to vote against someone like trump but also criticize dems. It's easy, you should try it.
So how do they get those white voters?
December 29, 2025 at 8:50 PM
So how do they get those white voters?
How many states allowed a 3rd party candidate on the ballot? You're not left bud.
December 29, 2025 at 8:47 PM
How many states allowed a 3rd party candidate on the ballot? You're not left bud.
Who's justifying? Fuck, your head is way up there...
December 29, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Who's justifying? Fuck, your head is way up there...
Jfc. How the hell do you get that out of what he said. He's wondering why he's seeing no messaging from the dems while seeing ads for ice. That's it. The last sentence is sarcasm because all we hear is we just need to vote harder. Why do you all think criticism of dems equals a vote for trump.
December 29, 2025 at 4:42 AM
Jfc. How the hell do you get that out of what he said. He's wondering why he's seeing no messaging from the dems while seeing ads for ice. That's it. The last sentence is sarcasm because all we hear is we just need to vote harder. Why do you all think criticism of dems equals a vote for trump.
We are way off topic. Ffs criticizing dems doesn't equal a vote for repubs. It's just criticism.
December 29, 2025 at 4:40 AM
We are way off topic. Ffs criticizing dems doesn't equal a vote for repubs. It's just criticism.
This also has noting to do with it. But I honestly believe it without even reading it. Thanks for the article.
December 29, 2025 at 4:21 AM
This also has noting to do with it. But I honestly believe it without even reading it. Thanks for the article.
That's a weird interpretation.
December 29, 2025 at 4:18 AM
That's a weird interpretation.
So their hands are tied no matter whether they win or lose?
December 29, 2025 at 4:18 AM
So their hands are tied no matter whether they win or lose?