That’s cool! Seems like it would be tough to model realistic plants, but maybe that’s because my experience is mostly with inorganic, rigid objects. My AI weed detector project worked pretty well using photos though.

Thank you! Yes I think about it all the time, I just haven’t had time/energy in quite a while. I’m hoping that refreshing the Airplanes course will get me fired up again 😄

Very interesting, makes sense! I’m not in academia, so thanks for the explanation

Sure, however I’d argue that example is a pretty exceptional case (with high stakes). On the more mundane side, I have seen plenty of health articles with wildly exaggerated headlines claiming “research shows…” that isn’t very conclusive if you actually read it.

Wouldn’t peer reviews be most useful to non-experts, like reporters, who cannot necessarily judge trustworthiness or validate the work?