The Alchemist
@alchemist19.bsky.social
Think Jung not Coelho. When I'm not turning lead to gold, I'm napping.
Absolutely no way he can side with an invasion of Greenland. But he might start talking about Denmark and US sharing sovereignty in interest of Nato solidarity or some such rubbish. I can see him trying to adopt such a tortuous position
January 17, 2026 at 6:44 PM
Absolutely no way he can side with an invasion of Greenland. But he might start talking about Denmark and US sharing sovereignty in interest of Nato solidarity or some such rubbish. I can see him trying to adopt such a tortuous position
To repeat the point, the ones in the shit are the UK. There is no simple response for Starmer given the UK's self-inflicted "situation."
January 17, 2026 at 6:34 PM
To repeat the point, the ones in the shit are the UK. There is no simple response for Starmer given the UK's self-inflicted "situation."
I'm referring to whether EU should impose counter tariffs. They shouldn't. These tariffs will hurt US more than EU. As far as the supply chains are concerned, that's a more medium term concern. Always good to diversify anyway.
January 17, 2026 at 6:33 PM
I'm referring to whether EU should impose counter tariffs. They shouldn't. These tariffs will hurt US more than EU. As far as the supply chains are concerned, that's a more medium term concern. Always good to diversify anyway.
EU doesn't need to and shouldn't do anything. Trump is winding out his own rope. UK are the one's in a quandary here.
January 17, 2026 at 6:27 PM
EU doesn't need to and shouldn't do anything. Trump is winding out his own rope. UK are the one's in a quandary here.
Once that happens, US are in serious trouble. Ability to retain military supremacy will also be threatened as it will be unaffordable. Of course, they'll still have loads of nukes. But so do Russia. And no one's calling them a world power anymore. So weird US are letting this happen...
January 17, 2026 at 6:07 PM
Once that happens, US are in serious trouble. Ability to retain military supremacy will also be threatened as it will be unaffordable. Of course, they'll still have loads of nukes. But so do Russia. And no one's calling them a world power anymore. So weird US are letting this happen...
Not quite sure about that. US benefited hugely from being anchor of world economy. Comes with immense advantages such as being able to run up $trillion in deficits and not be worried there won't be market for your debt. What Trump is doing will turn bond market against US...
January 17, 2026 at 6:07 PM
Not quite sure about that. US benefited hugely from being anchor of world economy. Comes with immense advantages such as being able to run up $trillion in deficits and not be worried there won't be market for your debt. What Trump is doing will turn bond market against US...
Some Chinese were celebrating when Trump won 2024 elections as they reckon it would be the end of US as a world power. We're seeing that bet paying out.
January 17, 2026 at 5:53 PM
Some Chinese were celebrating when Trump won 2024 elections as they reckon it would be the end of US as a world power. We're seeing that bet paying out.
Can you briefly explain this instrument?
January 17, 2026 at 4:56 PM
Can you briefly explain this instrument?
Mike Judge is prophet.
January 16, 2026 at 8:33 AM
Mike Judge is prophet.
Judean People's Front
September 17, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Judean People's Front
Sounds like Trump.
September 6, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Sounds like Trump.
Reposted by The Alchemist
It's 100% intentional. If the content returns, we must also be diligent to ensure it is the correct content.
techcrunch.com/2025/08/06/k...
techcrunch.com/2025/08/06/k...
Key sections of the US Constitution deleted from government's website | TechCrunch
Internet sleuths say the U.S. Constitution's website is now missing key sections from its website, including a key legal provision relating to habeas corpus, which protects citizens from unlawful dete...
techcrunch.com
August 6, 2025 at 3:41 PM
It's 100% intentional. If the content returns, we must also be diligent to ensure it is the correct content.
techcrunch.com/2025/08/06/k...
techcrunch.com/2025/08/06/k...
Can you say why the UK is the outlier in accepting the principle of tariffs? Surely, we can't be the only vulnerable country?
July 12, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Can you say why the UK is the outlier in accepting the principle of tariffs? Surely, we can't be the only vulnerable country?
She is looking a lot like IDS.
May 3, 2025 at 6:35 PM
She is looking a lot like IDS.
Agree. Great stuff.
April 28, 2025 at 8:49 AM
Agree. Great stuff.
At what point do we all agree that the UK is now a failing state?
March 21, 2025 at 9:24 PM
At what point do we all agree that the UK is now a failing state?
Reposted by The Alchemist
Exit poll data.
Why history matters in one incredible image
Why history matters in one incredible image
February 23, 2025 at 7:42 PM
Exit poll data.
Why history matters in one incredible image
Why history matters in one incredible image
In an ideal world, of course Poch should have been backed when he talked about the need for a painful rebuild. But I give Levy a pass on that one. Getting the stadium built was crucial to securing the club's long term future. It was the right choice.
January 26, 2025 at 4:47 PM
In an ideal world, of course Poch should have been backed when he talked about the need for a painful rebuild. But I give Levy a pass on that one. Getting the stadium built was crucial to securing the club's long term future. It was the right choice.
How was Sugar better than Scholar? We won one trophy under Sugar and quite a few with Scholar.
January 26, 2025 at 4:43 PM
How was Sugar better than Scholar? We won one trophy under Sugar and quite a few with Scholar.
What I find odd about all this is why Labour is pursuing a "Theresa May" strategy in this proposed reset. The EU has consistently rejected Cakeism. Starmer and Reeves know this. So what is their objective here?
January 26, 2025 at 4:36 PM
What I find odd about all this is why Labour is pursuing a "Theresa May" strategy in this proposed reset. The EU has consistently rejected Cakeism. Starmer and Reeves know this. So what is their objective here?
He was the one that worked. I'm not Levy out because despite all the fuck-ups, the club is in a better state than when he took it over. I still remember the Sugar years. Even grimmer than now.
January 26, 2025 at 4:31 PM
He was the one that worked. I'm not Levy out because despite all the fuck-ups, the club is in a better state than when he took it over. I still remember the Sugar years. Even grimmer than now.