Alex Reeve (storyjoy)
banner
alexreeve.bsky.social
Alex Reeve (storyjoy)
@alexreeve.bsky.social
Award-losing author of the Leo Stanhope series of historical crime novels published by Bloomsbury. Rep’d by Carrie Plitt at Felicity Bryan Associates. Otherwise, an absent-minded Professor. Tries to be a good egg. Also enjoys a good egg. He/him.
These kinds of thing don't work for me, but everyone's process is different. Creative inspiration is very personal, I think.
January 20, 2025 at 12:33 PM
Thank you!
January 7, 2025 at 10:31 AM
Obvs not the point, but someone at The Spectator needs to read GRRM's books before abusing them. No such things occur.
December 19, 2024 at 9:19 PM
Bit murdery
December 19, 2024 at 8:41 PM
Yes - I guess some novels have a kind of meta story that reveals itself - eg Owen Meaney and Use of Weapons. I’d be tempted to read those again.
December 12, 2024 at 10:00 PM
These things can edge towards snobbery, ie some novels are ‘worthy’ of repeat reads and others not, and I don’t accept that idea at all.
December 12, 2024 at 2:46 PM
It’s so personal, isn’t it? I wouldn’t read Agatha Christie twice, but I know people who do. Whereas I might read James Ellroy or Walter Mosley more than once. I think it’s more about the reader than the writer.
December 12, 2024 at 2:42 PM
There are grey areas here between 'written by', 'story by' and so on. I've heard of some celebs who genuinely think they wrote something which has been heavily edited / borderline ghosted by the publisher.
December 11, 2024 at 10:19 AM
Yes. My only caution is that celeb books are propping up publishers' revenues, & it isn't clear whether they're cannibalising proper books or are additive. Some of each, probably. As a first step, a specific recognition of who actually wrote the book - preferably on the cover - would be positive.
December 11, 2024 at 10:16 AM
Top stuff. Love it.
December 10, 2024 at 7:11 PM
Yep, for sure. He's messing with the WRONG demographic.
December 8, 2024 at 9:38 PM
He's not easily bullied at corners and is a decent stopper. Old school, but good as a back-up.
December 8, 2024 at 9:29 PM
I agree. I truly don’t want to cut off a revenue stream for publishers, but they should be clear when a work is written to a great extent by someone else. As you say, this should be addressed more strongly by SoA, CWA, etc.
December 6, 2024 at 11:18 PM
Yes, agreed. I daresay ghost writers like the income, and fair enough. I’m not against ghost writing per se at all. I just think the publisher should be more clear - find a form of words by which an interested reader can see who did what. It doesn’t seem a lot to ask.
December 6, 2024 at 3:16 PM
This is a very good point.
December 6, 2024 at 3:11 PM
Agreed, most likely, and sadly.
December 6, 2024 at 12:39 PM
True, of course, and the books may actually be great. But can’t they be honest anyway?
December 6, 2024 at 12:35 PM