Alex Reeve (storyjoy)
@alexreeve.bsky.social
Award-losing author of the Leo Stanhope series of historical crime novels published by Bloomsbury. Rep’d by Carrie Plitt at Felicity Bryan Associates. Otherwise, an absent-minded Professor. Tries to be a good egg. Also enjoys a good egg. He/him.
These kinds of thing don't work for me, but everyone's process is different. Creative inspiration is very personal, I think.
January 20, 2025 at 12:33 PM
These kinds of thing don't work for me, but everyone's process is different. Creative inspiration is very personal, I think.
Obvs not the point, but someone at The Spectator needs to read GRRM's books before abusing them. No such things occur.
December 19, 2024 at 9:19 PM
Obvs not the point, but someone at The Spectator needs to read GRRM's books before abusing them. No such things occur.
Yes - I guess some novels have a kind of meta story that reveals itself - eg Owen Meaney and Use of Weapons. I’d be tempted to read those again.
December 12, 2024 at 10:00 PM
Yes - I guess some novels have a kind of meta story that reveals itself - eg Owen Meaney and Use of Weapons. I’d be tempted to read those again.
These things can edge towards snobbery, ie some novels are ‘worthy’ of repeat reads and others not, and I don’t accept that idea at all.
December 12, 2024 at 2:46 PM
These things can edge towards snobbery, ie some novels are ‘worthy’ of repeat reads and others not, and I don’t accept that idea at all.
It’s so personal, isn’t it? I wouldn’t read Agatha Christie twice, but I know people who do. Whereas I might read James Ellroy or Walter Mosley more than once. I think it’s more about the reader than the writer.
December 12, 2024 at 2:42 PM
It’s so personal, isn’t it? I wouldn’t read Agatha Christie twice, but I know people who do. Whereas I might read James Ellroy or Walter Mosley more than once. I think it’s more about the reader than the writer.
There are grey areas here between 'written by', 'story by' and so on. I've heard of some celebs who genuinely think they wrote something which has been heavily edited / borderline ghosted by the publisher.
December 11, 2024 at 10:19 AM
There are grey areas here between 'written by', 'story by' and so on. I've heard of some celebs who genuinely think they wrote something which has been heavily edited / borderline ghosted by the publisher.
Yes. My only caution is that celeb books are propping up publishers' revenues, & it isn't clear whether they're cannibalising proper books or are additive. Some of each, probably. As a first step, a specific recognition of who actually wrote the book - preferably on the cover - would be positive.
December 11, 2024 at 10:16 AM
Yes. My only caution is that celeb books are propping up publishers' revenues, & it isn't clear whether they're cannibalising proper books or are additive. Some of each, probably. As a first step, a specific recognition of who actually wrote the book - preferably on the cover - would be positive.
Top stuff. Love it.
December 10, 2024 at 7:11 PM
Top stuff. Love it.
Yep, for sure. He's messing with the WRONG demographic.
December 8, 2024 at 9:38 PM
Yep, for sure. He's messing with the WRONG demographic.
He's not easily bullied at corners and is a decent stopper. Old school, but good as a back-up.
December 8, 2024 at 9:29 PM
He's not easily bullied at corners and is a decent stopper. Old school, but good as a back-up.
I agree. I truly don’t want to cut off a revenue stream for publishers, but they should be clear when a work is written to a great extent by someone else. As you say, this should be addressed more strongly by SoA, CWA, etc.
December 6, 2024 at 11:18 PM
I agree. I truly don’t want to cut off a revenue stream for publishers, but they should be clear when a work is written to a great extent by someone else. As you say, this should be addressed more strongly by SoA, CWA, etc.
Yes, agreed. I daresay ghost writers like the income, and fair enough. I’m not against ghost writing per se at all. I just think the publisher should be more clear - find a form of words by which an interested reader can see who did what. It doesn’t seem a lot to ask.
December 6, 2024 at 3:16 PM
Yes, agreed. I daresay ghost writers like the income, and fair enough. I’m not against ghost writing per se at all. I just think the publisher should be more clear - find a form of words by which an interested reader can see who did what. It doesn’t seem a lot to ask.
This is a very good point.
December 6, 2024 at 3:11 PM
This is a very good point.
Agreed, most likely, and sadly.
December 6, 2024 at 12:39 PM
Agreed, most likely, and sadly.
True, of course, and the books may actually be great. But can’t they be honest anyway?
December 6, 2024 at 12:35 PM
True, of course, and the books may actually be great. But can’t they be honest anyway?