Don’t get me wrong, when a team wins after 120 minutes, it definitely is a deserved win and congratulations for that, at the same time, my thought was, with a proper striker, the scoreline would have been very different

I don’t understand this mentality, if Zirkzee’s deflected shot at the end if the match would go in, would you call it a deflected goal? I know I wouldn’t. The penalty was undeserved and we never scored from it! What do you call the other chances then?

Completely true! I don’t understand why everyone is blind to this.. We created enough chances to beat this team 5-1.. not having a proper striker continues to cost us.. 3 big chances for Havertz, Two huge chances for Rice, one cleared off the line when Trossard needed to tap the ball in, One Penalty

We didn’t “barely” create, we created enough chances to beat this team 5-1.. not having a proper striker continues to cost us.. 3 big chances for Havertz, Two huge chances for Rice, one cleared off the line when Trossard needed to tap the ball in.. One Penalty.. come on!

Jorginho is one of our best penalty takers, he would have been one of the main candidates to score a penalty for us

I wouldn’t bet he would have scored that even if he had reached it

Yeah the word choice used was Arsenal should have played their attacking game against Man city , just like how spu*s

True, are we not using trossard cause of the contract situation?

Never a pen that.. I would be fuming if that was given against us..

Bruno’s shot was absolute perfection.. need to learn basics.. we dont know how to finish