Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
@alison-galbraith.bsky.social
92 followers 110 following 3 posts
Pediatrician & health services researcher @The_BMC. Health insurance policy & access/affordability for kids and families.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
alison-galbraith.bsky.social
@jtkantor.bsky.social Can you play a Matt the Electrician song at today’s Braves game??
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
britshmit.bsky.social
🚀 Big reveal! Introducing our interactive table on NIH grant terminations, supercharged from the original Google tracker! 📊👇

Help us uncover which NIH grants are tagged for termination and why! 🕵️🔍

1 / 🧵

#HealthEquity #MedSky #PublicHealth
Airtable | Everyone's app platform
Airtable is a low-code platform for building collaborative apps. Customize your workflow, collaborate, and achieve ambitious outcomes. Get started for free.
airtable.com
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
drscotthadland.bsky.social
Erasing science doesn’t make ‘undesirable’ problems go away—it makes them worse.

The #NIH is terminating grants. LGBTQ+ health research is a clear target.

LGBTQ+ people face stigma & violence. This research saves lives. Let’s not stay silent.

Terminated grants 👇🏻
taggs.hhs.gov/Content/Data...
taggs.hhs.gov
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
jama.com
JAMA @jama.com · Feb 20
In a new Editorial, JAMA editors, JAMA Network Editors in Chief, and JAMA editorial leadership address the recent executive orders that have impacted the scientific process and reaffirm their commitment to scientific and editorial integrity.

ja.ma/4b5LsIt
Image shows the JAMA brand logo with the quote, "The silencing of this scientific discourse directly threatens the professional oaths that many have taken." Below the quote, the text shows: "JAMA editors, JAMA Network Editors in Chief, and JAMA editorial leadership."
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
adrianna.bsky.social
This is a very good story on the uncertainty created by the disruption to NIH activity — and how the stakes are highest for the most junior scholars.

There's also a submission form at the bottom to share your experiences if the pause has impacted you. www.statnews.com/2025/01/24/t...
Trump freeze on NIH grant reviews alarms scientists, with long-term impact uncertain
Scientists nationwide said the cancellation of NIH grant reviews has thrown early-career scientists into limbo
www.statnews.com
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
dusetzinas.bsky.social
I'm hearing through colleagues that this is the source of the NIH study section cancellations. From the link - need for contracts/grants to agree to comply with the "anti-discrimination" laws and having terms to certify they do not operate programs promoting DEI.
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
stephenwpatrick.bsky.social
This is worrisome.

NIH study sections canceled? Mine is scheduled to meet next month. Not sure if it's still happening.

Study sections are basically volunteer. We do it to give back to the process that supported us and to support science.

Impact could be lasting

www.science.org/content/arti...
Trump hits NIH with ‘devastating’ freezes on meetings, travel, communications, and hiring
Researchers facing
www.science.org
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
Reposted by Alison Galbraith, MD, MPH
jsalomon.bsky.social
“This is a time for more science, not less, and for the value of science to be defended and promoted … To generate evidence. To correct misinformation. To create accountability. And to engage.”

The Lancet

www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
This is a time for more science, not less, and for the value of science to be defended and promoted. For scientific institutions and the career scientists who staff them—particularly those working with and within the Trump administration—the priority is to continue their work. To generate evidence. To correct misinformation. To create accountability. And to engage. Federal agency scientists working with the incoming administration have been described as a key guardrail against the worst politicisation of science. COVID-19 showed that respected and capable scientists can exert valuable influence in even the most trying political environments by taking an open and non-partisan approach. No doubt many will be called on to do so again over the next 4 years. It will be no easy task, requiring a clear-eyed sense of pragmatism, a steadfast belief in the value of scientific principles, and a good deal of courage.