This may be of interest for @clarakm.bsky.social @zacksavitsky.bsky.social @monisharavis.bsky.social
@jtimmer.bsky.social @nebulousnikki.bsky.social @markzastrow.com @chrislintott.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/alum...
Our paper has been published and we show that the large 🧪 oxygen nebula is in the Milky Way.
This arc was discovered by amateurs photographing Andromeda with an [O III] filter, and now we have new things to say... ⚛️
This may be of interest for @clarakm.bsky.social @zacksavitsky.bsky.social @monisharavis.bsky.social
@jtimmer.bsky.social @nebulousnikki.bsky.social @markzastrow.com @chrislintott.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/alum...
We don't think the velocities we measure in the gas agree with it. The turbulence (width of the emission lines) is also, we think, too low to be caused by shocks in the gas.
So...more research is needed to know for sure why is this nebula shining! 🔭
We don't think the velocities we measure in the gas agree with it. The turbulence (width of the emission lines) is also, we think, too low to be caused by shocks in the gas.
So...more research is needed to know for sure why is this nebula shining! 🔭
These two evidences show that the nebula is located within the Milky Way. 🔭
These two evidences show that the nebula is located within the Milky Way. 🔭
We see it separated from [O III], in layers. These structures are too small to be resolved in distant nebula, but easy to see in Milky Way objects. 🔭
We see it separated from [O III], in layers. These structures are too small to be resolved in distant nebula, but easy to see in Milky Way objects. 🔭
To sum up: Observing with two telescopes (GTC and JAST80) we confirm that SDSO-1 is in the Milky Way, but we don't think that its origin is clear yet.
We believe that the "Ghost Planetary Nebula" hypothesis doesn't agree with our data. 🔭
To sum up: Observing with two telescopes (GTC and JAST80) we confirm that SDSO-1 is in the Milky Way, but we don't think that its origin is clear yet.
We believe that the "Ghost Planetary Nebula" hypothesis doesn't agree with our data. 🔭
Even before us, others published different results (arxiv.org/abs/2303.09425 and arxiv.org/abs/2307.06308).
I think the nebula still remains (a bit) mysterious!
Even before us, others published different results (arxiv.org/abs/2303.09425 and arxiv.org/abs/2307.06308).
I think the nebula still remains (a bit) mysterious!
You can read a bit more about it in the thread I wrote when we presented the paper: bsky.app/profile/alum...
Today we try to decipher it! It's ✨Paper Day✨
arxiv.org/abs/2412.08327
With spectra from GTC (the largest 🔭) and OAJ large narrowband images we find the nebula is actually not related to M31!
But how?👇
#Astrophysics
You can read a bit more about it in the thread I wrote when we presented the paper: bsky.app/profile/alum...
And here is a thread explaining it:
bsky.app/profile/alum...
Today we try to decipher it! It's ✨Paper Day✨
arxiv.org/abs/2412.08327
With spectra from GTC (the largest 🔭) and OAJ large narrowband images we find the nebula is actually not related to M31!
But how?👇
#Astrophysics
And here is a thread explaining it:
bsky.app/profile/alum...
We used also a telescope from the OAJ (Teruel, Spain). And we are not sure of what it is exactly, but it does seem to be in the Milky Way.
For more info, the paper arxiv.org/abs/2412.08327 and my thread 👇
bsky.app/profile/alum...
Today we try to decipher it! It's ✨Paper Day✨
arxiv.org/abs/2412.08327
With spectra from GTC (the largest 🔭) and OAJ large narrowband images we find the nebula is actually not related to M31!
But how?👇
#Astrophysics
We used also a telescope from the OAJ (Teruel, Spain). And we are not sure of what it is exactly, but it does seem to be in the Milky Way.
For more info, the paper arxiv.org/abs/2412.08327 and my thread 👇
bsky.app/profile/alum...