Amanda Riddell
@ampp.bsky.social
Left-libertarian radical.
My political philosophy: social equity, death by satire.
Whakapapa
Ngāti Mahuta, Ngāti Hikairo, Ngāti Oneone, Ngāti Irakehu
Founder: AMPP
https://www.amandamichelinasprogressiveparty.com/ampp
My political philosophy: social equity, death by satire.
Whakapapa
Ngāti Mahuta, Ngāti Hikairo, Ngāti Oneone, Ngāti Irakehu
Founder: AMPP
https://www.amandamichelinasprogressiveparty.com/ampp
Been busy. It's on my list for next year.
December 25, 2025 at 2:07 AM
Been busy. It's on my list for next year.
By the way, it was a miscommunication, and I am still set to inherit from my grandmother's death.
I've taken a video of this threat. It's further evidence.
Brian Tamaki might want to back off...
I've taken a video of this threat. It's further evidence.
Brian Tamaki might want to back off...
December 22, 2025 at 9:24 PM
By the way, it was a miscommunication, and I am still set to inherit from my grandmother's death.
I've taken a video of this threat. It's further evidence.
Brian Tamaki might want to back off...
I've taken a video of this threat. It's further evidence.
Brian Tamaki might want to back off...
They aren't evidence on their own, but in sequence with my blog posts and other evidence, the pattern of distress is clear.
Also, even if I am mentally ill, the laws are changing and the new metric is indeed subjective distress.
The police agree there's a case.
They've worked on it since January.
Also, even if I am mentally ill, the laws are changing and the new metric is indeed subjective distress.
The police agree there's a case.
They've worked on it since January.
December 22, 2025 at 9:22 PM
They aren't evidence on their own, but in sequence with my blog posts and other evidence, the pattern of distress is clear.
Also, even if I am mentally ill, the laws are changing and the new metric is indeed subjective distress.
The police agree there's a case.
They've worked on it since January.
Also, even if I am mentally ill, the laws are changing and the new metric is indeed subjective distress.
The police agree there's a case.
They've worked on it since January.
No, I can have bipolar while the evidence is still real.
Given your obsession with trolling me, you're either mentally ill, or some prick that spends hours deciding how to hurt me.
All you're doing is proving my case is real.
Why would you be writing otherwise?
In fact, you're extending my case.
Given your obsession with trolling me, you're either mentally ill, or some prick that spends hours deciding how to hurt me.
All you're doing is proving my case is real.
Why would you be writing otherwise?
In fact, you're extending my case.
December 22, 2025 at 9:20 PM
No, I can have bipolar while the evidence is still real.
Given your obsession with trolling me, you're either mentally ill, or some prick that spends hours deciding how to hurt me.
All you're doing is proving my case is real.
Why would you be writing otherwise?
In fact, you're extending my case.
Given your obsession with trolling me, you're either mentally ill, or some prick that spends hours deciding how to hurt me.
All you're doing is proving my case is real.
Why would you be writing otherwise?
In fact, you're extending my case.
X-Men 2. Saw it on a lot of planes.
December 22, 2025 at 2:03 AM
X-Men 2. Saw it on a lot of planes.
tweaked the titles so they're more consistent.
Basic job; could've gotten it smoother.
Basic job; could've gotten it smoother.
December 21, 2025 at 9:46 PM
tweaked the titles so they're more consistent.
Basic job; could've gotten it smoother.
Basic job; could've gotten it smoother.
It's not impossible, it's just unlikely.
Nobody has to believe my assertions, just the evidence.
The harassment evidence is real and with police.
You're the one who isn't using a real profile.
I'm keeping you unblocked to remind people the harassment is ongoing, and didn't magically disappear.
Nobody has to believe my assertions, just the evidence.
The harassment evidence is real and with police.
You're the one who isn't using a real profile.
I'm keeping you unblocked to remind people the harassment is ongoing, and didn't magically disappear.
December 21, 2025 at 8:17 PM
It's not impossible, it's just unlikely.
Nobody has to believe my assertions, just the evidence.
The harassment evidence is real and with police.
You're the one who isn't using a real profile.
I'm keeping you unblocked to remind people the harassment is ongoing, and didn't magically disappear.
Nobody has to believe my assertions, just the evidence.
The harassment evidence is real and with police.
You're the one who isn't using a real profile.
I'm keeping you unblocked to remind people the harassment is ongoing, and didn't magically disappear.
No, I don't think I'm infallible. I publish corrections.
I haven't had to in a while.
Unless you're willing to out yourself as a specific individual, then I'm just going to keep this going as proof of harassment.
You're calling me names while accusing me of calling other people names. Bugger off.
I haven't had to in a while.
Unless you're willing to out yourself as a specific individual, then I'm just going to keep this going as proof of harassment.
You're calling me names while accusing me of calling other people names. Bugger off.
December 20, 2025 at 6:08 PM
No, I don't think I'm infallible. I publish corrections.
I haven't had to in a while.
Unless you're willing to out yourself as a specific individual, then I'm just going to keep this going as proof of harassment.
You're calling me names while accusing me of calling other people names. Bugger off.
I haven't had to in a while.
Unless you're willing to out yourself as a specific individual, then I'm just going to keep this going as proof of harassment.
You're calling me names while accusing me of calling other people names. Bugger off.
Is this grown-up enough?
And, again, you're painting a picture my relatives are somehow morally infallible, and only I behaved inappropriately.
That's typically your pattern. Isolate me from context, then insult me via the isolated interpretation.
And, again, you're painting a picture my relatives are somehow morally infallible, and only I behaved inappropriately.
That's typically your pattern. Isolate me from context, then insult me via the isolated interpretation.
An Open Letter re: the Olga Riddell Trust
This letter is written openly so that my position is clear, consistent, and not misrepresented. My brother and I were removed as discretionary beneficiaries of the Olga Riddell Trust by a deed dated 13 November 2020. That document exists, and I do not deny that it was executed.However, several things also need to be said plainly.First, our primary objective is simple: we are seeking to receive a fair share of the trust. We are not seeking punishment, public blame, or family conflict. We are se
www.amandamichelinasprogressiveparty.com
December 20, 2025 at 7:09 AM
Is this grown-up enough?
And, again, you're painting a picture my relatives are somehow morally infallible, and only I behaved inappropriately.
That's typically your pattern. Isolate me from context, then insult me via the isolated interpretation.
And, again, you're painting a picture my relatives are somehow morally infallible, and only I behaved inappropriately.
That's typically your pattern. Isolate me from context, then insult me via the isolated interpretation.
nasty? Asserting my legal rights is nasty?
December 20, 2025 at 5:15 AM
nasty? Asserting my legal rights is nasty?
I haven't even seen those people since 2019.
Regardless, I kept emailing my grandmother.
It's her money, not theirs.
They said far worse about me earlier this year.
Regardless, I kept emailing my grandmother.
It's her money, not theirs.
They said far worse about me earlier this year.
December 20, 2025 at 5:15 AM
I haven't even seen those people since 2019.
Regardless, I kept emailing my grandmother.
It's her money, not theirs.
They said far worse about me earlier this year.
Regardless, I kept emailing my grandmother.
It's her money, not theirs.
They said far worse about me earlier this year.