hahaha love it

But she is so cute 😹

worth discussing, yes, but i guess i’m less concerned with which words, phrases we’ve been using than with what kind of human these conversations assume and produce

then, the phrases labeled “flat” or “human”... like flat and human for whom? That framing assumes a “human” detached from class, race, gender, local... im just wary that this might reproduce a kind of linguistic policing

Not here to weigh in on AI use, but to think about it. I guess my issue is with the idea of “giving words to AI” as if they somehow belong to AI. The terms the article singles out (delve, tapestry, nuance) aren’t new or AI specific but now we seem to think they are out of context

The focus shifts away from the uniqueness of the work toward how well it performs in the attention economy

Not quite like that but have you read graves in academe?

hahah ouvindo pela primeira vez aqui, vou adotar kkk