Andrew Roberts
andrewroberts.bsky.social
Andrew Roberts
@andrewroberts.bsky.social
Political science at Northwestern. My substack, A Political Scientist's Progress, here: https://andrewroberts.substack.com/.
Don't want to hijack the thread, but I'm also convinced that Cosmo Kramer is a Trump voter (Newman presumably too): substack.com/@andrewrober.... I don't think he gets on the ICE train though.
February 4, 2026 at 9:14 AM
I think Michael Bailey's work is one of the examples: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers..... It's not my area though.
Ideological Moderation and Success in U.S. Elections, 2020-2022 *
Understanding how candidate ideology affects elections is crucial to understanding representation. We assess the influence of ideological positioning on electio
papers.ssrn.com
February 4, 2026 at 6:34 AM
To separate content and style. On the first few drafts, the important thing is to get ideas and text on paper. Just ignore style, grammar, and organization, which all slow you down. You can fix all that stuff later during revisions. Ofc, don't forget to revise many times after you write the content.
January 21, 2026 at 7:50 AM
But it all fits together. He is very explicitly an interim president. He came out of retirement (he is 86 and stepped down as president in 2009) when the last president resigned and is only serving until a new president is chosen.
November 29, 2025 at 6:34 AM
Reminds me of one of my favorite Geoff Nunberg pieces on the use of English accents in movies: freshairarchive.org/segments/arc.... Apparently the equation of British accent & villain started in the sword-and-sandal epics before moving to fantasy and sci-fi.
August 17, 2025 at 9:10 PM
He's the son of a good political scientist too, which makes it stranger.
August 17, 2025 at 8:15 PM
Thanks for the overly kind words. I learned so much from your work on all these issues.
July 16, 2025 at 6:29 AM
Congrats, Martin! You should be proud! Hope we can celebrate it some time.
May 16, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Here's some (imperfect) data on this point: andrewroberts.substack.com/p/how-politi.... It seems that AP, CP, and IR agree on most issues around Trump with PT something of an outlier.
How political scientists view Trump
A test of the Musgrave thesis
andrewroberts.substack.com
April 24, 2025 at 6:47 AM
I'm teaching a good portion of it next week in Comparative Political Institutions. A really nice set of selections. I added updates on several of the pieces (Geddes and Hooghe & Marks on Lipset and Rokkan; Katz & Mair on cartel parties to update Kirchheimer).
January 27, 2025 at 11:38 PM
Thanks for the nice link! Your own ideas are an inspiration and far cleverer than mine.
August 28, 2024 at 8:39 PM
Seriously, would love to see a replication of Fred Greenstein's Children and Politics if it hasn't been done already. His little subjects were big fans of executive authority (eg, the president is the best man in the world) and the police.
August 13, 2024 at 9:05 PM
I've written a little about differences in the views of political scientists and ordinary people here: andrewroberts.substack.com/p/do-politic....
January 18, 2024 at 5:14 PM
I thought this was great. Congratulations! I'd be curious how political scientists answer the same questions. Bright Line Watch has been conducting surveys of them for a while. Maybe they'd agree to include them in their next round.
January 18, 2024 at 5:13 PM