We don’t have anything open at the moment, but there’s a lovely “Get Job Updates“ button here: free.law/hiring/

Well, it's unawareness in the sense that bullshitting is different than lying. He does not *care* about ethics limitations. He would not follow them regardless of knowing about them or not.

Yes, but also tell us what you're looking for 😀

Weirdly enough, one of the two co-authors is from Google!

I'm not holding my breath, but still, it's bracing to see the truth written this plainly, and it's an artifact humanist technologists can cite with honor :)

Today, all the most popular browsers are funded and built by either an ad tech company or a wannabe ad tech company (www.mozilla.org/en-US/advert...), making this statement of principle nearly heretical. I'm beyond delighted to see it. Here's to more web user agents by and for humans.

The "Loyalty" principle says:

"A user agent must serve its user’s interests over its implementer’s interests and over the interests of any other party."

The draft enumerates three specific duties:
1. Protection
2. Honesty
3. Loyalty
These are all important, but to me, the most interesting (and radical) one is Loyalty.

You should, quite obviously, be fired.

I ran across this W3C Editor's Draft yesterday, and it has some really surprising *bangers* about user agents *owing duties* to their *human* principals. All is not lost! w3ctag.github.io/user-agents/

something something public safety infrastructure, ADS-B, and "assassination coordinates"
sentinel-aviation.com/blog/assassi...

Uhhh