Jonathan Gleklen
antitrustguy.bsky.social
Jonathan Gleklen
@antitrustguy.bsky.social
Husband, father, antitrust lawyer. Not necessarily in that order.
The Orr injunction covers a class that expressly excludes our plaintiffs, who had filed a separate case.
September 9, 2025 at 4:44 PM
22 USC 7430. The next President can send those responsible to The Hague.
September 4, 2025 at 2:08 AM
Maybe. But your post makes it sound like she is heading there for beach time, which she’s not.
August 15, 2025 at 4:35 PM
She is the single mother of a 7-year-old daughter who needs to be picked up at camp, which she is doing and then returning to the District. I think she's capable of multi-tasking for 1 day.
August 15, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Where is Chad? Now a soccer dad?

charlotteclymer.substack.com/p/an-open-le...
An Open Letter to Chad the Soccer Dad
A few things, Chad.
charlotteclymer.substack.com
July 29, 2025 at 5:58 PM
And I looked at your other paper. “Oncology” etc. is not an antitrust market. And looking at clinical trials means looking at products generally without revenue and thus not subject to Section 8 anyway. Even with revenue the 2% or 4% de minimis thresholds likely apply.
June 17, 2025 at 10:46 PM
I looked at n.101 of the paper, which says competitors are identified with a “proprietary methodology” by Pitchbook.
June 17, 2025 at 10:29 PM
I'm skeptical of the accuracy of the definition of competitor. It seems unlikely that 30% of pharma and biotech companies have interlocks in markets that are properly defined (i.e not "pharmaceuticals"). With 2500 companies in the sample, most are going to have only a handful of products.
June 17, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Current events are already providing lots of active douches. I'd consider alternatives.
June 12, 2025 at 9:24 PM
I don't think CHEST journal is about what he thinks it is. Just saying.
April 17, 2025 at 10:49 PM
The opening paragraph:“The Order is an unconstitutional abomination and it should only continue to exist in Continuing Legal Education materials to teach lawyers and judges precisely what not to do – ever – when it comes to the issuance of preliminary relief against speech.”

Wow. Just wow.
April 4, 2025 at 8:28 PM
They've condemned her
March 5, 2025 at 9:02 PM
The OpEd says the nearest big box store is 50 miles away. Discrimination in favor of that big box store has no impact on competition and thus is not reached by the RP Act regardless.
January 24, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Russia? He’s moving in to her basement.
December 7, 2024 at 2:55 PM
Now do Fox News.
November 14, 2024 at 5:32 PM
The common law of burial grounds. Here's a 168 page opinion to get you started. www.mdcourts.gov/data/opinion...
www.mdcourts.gov
October 19, 2024 at 5:03 PM