It is an example of how using computational humanities can fruitfully interact with more conventional scholarship, and thereby raise new questions.
It is an example of how using computational humanities can fruitfully interact with more conventional scholarship, and thereby raise new questions.
What's important here is that this LLM-based method enabled me to use a framework from another discipline, and to replicate some conventional ideas from Human Animal Studies
What's important here is that this LLM-based method enabled me to use a framework from another discipline, and to replicate some conventional ideas from Human Animal Studies
Exploitation ⬆️
Reason ⬆️
I see no significant change in Moralistic. And there's a decline in Symbolic and Spiritual
Exploitation ⬆️
Reason ⬆️
I see no significant change in Moralistic. And there's a decline in Symbolic and Spiritual
Moralistic (=ethical concern) ⬆️
Exploitation (=material use) ⬆️
Reason (=scientific interest) ⬆️
But...
Moralistic (=ethical concern) ⬆️
Exploitation (=material use) ⬆️
Reason (=scientific interest) ⬆️
But...
Practically, it means being a lot harsher in grading. Gaps in historiography or misunderstanding key concepts --> fail.
An GPU is basically a box of sand; if you cant ameliorate inorganic matter you don't deserve an academic grade.
Practically, it means being a lot harsher in grading. Gaps in historiography or misunderstanding key concepts --> fail.
An GPU is basically a box of sand; if you cant ameliorate inorganic matter you don't deserve an academic grade.
I think the switch we have to make is that with AI the level of what we deem sufficient has to be increased
I think the switch we have to make is that with AI the level of what we deem sufficient has to be increased