Arskiainen
arskiainen.bsky.social
Arskiainen
@arskiainen.bsky.social
Why do one thing perfectly when you can do many things
Yeah but if the AI was reliable you wouldn't need the app.
November 24, 2025 at 8:13 PM
This is the one thing i don't get. If they can make something without knowing how to make it, using a publicly available tool, why would someone pay them for it instead of making their own with the same tool?
November 24, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Why didn't Trump shout at him for not wearing a suit?
November 18, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Or "MACA".
November 17, 2025 at 8:47 AM
You couldn't easily do anything back then either. Today you can do a high fidelity 3d scan with physically accurate materials and relight it and path trace it through physically accurate virtual lenses with any smudges and imperfections imaginable. Not easily for sure.
November 3, 2025 at 2:38 PM
A broken clock is correct twice a day. I wouldn't use that as reasoning to break clocks in general.
November 1, 2025 at 3:41 PM
It might be that their dev team is genuinely into that type of game. It could also be that they can't find devs/designers to match their audience. Maybe they are pessimising the reach of their core brand.
October 11, 2025 at 10:13 AM
There are so many mechanics directions to explore. Wow. Attract/repel, distract, trails, cleanliness, deodorants/perfumes, chemistry hacking. A bit of old cheese in a little sealed box.
September 17, 2025 at 8:17 AM
Because we have legal systems that don't rely purely on public outrage for justice? Because we respect peoples rights? Because death penalty for the crime of encountering the police is not really a thing here? Because police have an actual education instead of just a month of shooting practice?
September 17, 2025 at 8:00 AM
Fair points. A car has utility that is not contingent on enjoying it. Entertainment, I would argue, is also a tool. You use it stimulate brain juices. But it's utility is mainly just that.
September 9, 2025 at 4:21 PM
That's like saying you'll never drive a car that you built. Or go on a trip you meticulously researched and planned. Or see a movie you made. You'll not have the experience of going in blind. You wont have the "how was that made" curiosity. But if the game plays nice you'll play it.
September 9, 2025 at 1:43 PM
It's great and all, but you can't trust math, numbers, code, references, words or general information it spits to be accurate at all. It's like the ultimate version of mad libs with massive enegy consumption to boot.
August 13, 2025 at 5:59 PM
People have been around like a 100+ times longer then current economic models. The individual competitive model was slapped on to prevent spontaneous cooperative groups from challenging established power structures and monopolies. Always kicking down ladders and locking gates.
July 27, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Welp. I kinda hope I'm wrong though. Atleast some of the visual effects are due to interference, like the dark band. I don't know if there is a way to spoof it using trig, but it's not be feasible to model proper interference due to numerical inaccuracy with floating point.
July 19, 2025 at 9:16 AM
The mirage of intelligence breaks eventually. This kinda makes it break on his part. It might be turn out, our superior human consciousness is not more complex than a dumb word predicting machine with randomness from a chemical soup and that makes me sad. If they make AGI out of LLMs we are cursed.
July 16, 2025 at 7:17 AM
I maybe misunderstood. Wouldn't this just cause more jaggies?
July 15, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Me putting in the finishing touches at 3 am, 7 months into a 3 month project.
July 15, 2025 at 8:30 AM
I think you might need the interference at the sensor to get a rainbow.
July 9, 2025 at 2:04 PM
Cem Yuksel did a couple papers on the point light thing and I think EA had surfels.
June 28, 2025 at 9:20 AM
Is buoyancy at atmospheric pressures meaningful? Or the area of contact affects the subjective experience? Psychosomatic effect? A poorly defined statement?
June 27, 2025 at 2:20 PM