Alexander Douglas
@axdouglas.bsky.social
740 followers 540 following 270 posts
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy, University of St Andrews https://axdouglas.com/ https://axdouglas.substack.com/ Latest book: https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/456203/against-identity-by-douglas-alexander/9780241648216 Photo by Lauren Douglas
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Alexander Douglas
pingpongphilosophy.bsky.social
🎙️ In the very first episode of Ping Pong Philosophy, I sit down with Greg Restall, Shelby Cullom Davis Professor of Philosophy at the University of St. Andrews, to talk about possibilia, proof-theoretic semantics, and more!🏓 Full episode out now!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHyx...
Greg Restall on possibilia, discussing logical pluralism with Graham Priest and more I EP 1 🏓
YouTube video by Ping Pong Philosophy
www.youtube.com
axdouglas.bsky.social
Sub editors are intellectual vandals
axdouglas.bsky.social
I’m a strong advocate of ancient languages, but it seems dangerous to overpromise…
axdouglas.bsky.social
Thanks, somehow it’s consoling to know that I couldn’t have escaped.
axdouglas.bsky.social
Unis are run by people who haven’t updated their procedures from the days when forms were printed out and filled by hand. I was just wondering if we’re the only sector stuck with this stupid anachronism (along with many others).
axdouglas.bsky.social
We’re contractually stuck with MS, but Forms would be a whole lot better than trying to type into little boxes that don’t line up with the typing cursor, split over pages, etc.
axdouglas.bsky.social
People who work outside universities: do people in your workplace still think that a good way to create an online form is a make a Word document with little boxes? Not using the form function on Word: drawing actual boxes, like you would for a printed form, though they are hard to type into. Anyone?
axdouglas.bsky.social
I’ve subsequently had this thought: the Curtis Yarvin guys take the points in Girard that are obvious common sense and inflate them into some grand revelation. It’s as if I went around talking about Einstein’s WORLD CHANGING discovery that gravity exists. Right theory, wrong point.
axdouglas.bsky.social
_I See Satan Fall Like Lightning_

Curtis Yarvin appears to have read Girard about as carefully as he reads anything else. I wrote about the tech bros and Girard here: unherd.com/2025/06/tech...
Tech bros don’t get René Girard
unherd.com
axdouglas.bsky.social
I had the same thought: ok, everything is Christianity, but why does this matter?

René Girard is clearer on this. He is up front about thinking that modern life is, on the whole, good. So his point is that we should thank God for sending his only begotten son so that we could have modernity.
axdouglas.bsky.social
But he also says that conservative values are inherited from Christianity.
axdouglas.bsky.social
See you’re already doing complex calculations I can’t keep up with
axdouglas.bsky.social
Before slogans we had to express thoughts manually. We would choose individual words, one by one, and assemble them into sentences in order to express our feelings and beliefs. Hard to imagine in this automated age, but that’s how we did it.
axdouglas.bsky.social
I think it’s a very significant finding that if you model human choices as random rather than optimising you can recover a lot of the basis for classical political economy. It seems like something that would interest me, if I still did phil econ. But I don’t, so I guess it doesn’t matter.
axdouglas.bsky.social
No no, I didn’t mean econophysics; I meant something more specific.
axdouglas.bsky.social
Yes, that’s interesting stuff too, but it’s not what I meant.