ALL trans women are men. It’s a defining characteristic; something they all have in common. (I, a woman, could never be a trans woman.) Ergo, no trans women are women, they just say they are.
December 23, 2025 at 10:06 AM
ALL trans women are men. It’s a defining characteristic; something they all have in common. (I, a woman, could never be a trans woman.) Ergo, no trans women are women, they just say they are.
I have. The answer is the first question dealt with in the article I provided. Try reading. It leads to learning. Which leads to knowledge. I have given everything you need. I’m done here.
December 13, 2025 at 6:03 PM
I have. The answer is the first question dealt with in the article I provided. Try reading. It leads to learning. Which leads to knowledge. I have given everything you need. I’m done here.
Your premise is flawed.
Evolution only exists b/c of what you might call “exceptions” but biologists know are natural mutations. Some are beneficial, others are malfunctions. Still, in the case of sex, even those can be classified as male or female.
Mutation, injury, puberty, are not exceptions.
Evolution only exists b/c of what you might call “exceptions” but biologists know are natural mutations. Some are beneficial, others are malfunctions. Still, in the case of sex, even those can be classified as male or female.
Mutation, injury, puberty, are not exceptions.
December 13, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Your premise is flawed.
Evolution only exists b/c of what you might call “exceptions” but biologists know are natural mutations. Some are beneficial, others are malfunctions. Still, in the case of sex, even those can be classified as male or female.
Mutation, injury, puberty, are not exceptions.
Evolution only exists b/c of what you might call “exceptions” but biologists know are natural mutations. Some are beneficial, others are malfunctions. Still, in the case of sex, even those can be classified as male or female.
Mutation, injury, puberty, are not exceptions.
You could still read the article.
I however am leaving, but I leave you with one thought: science tries to prove itself wrong. Blind activism can only ever see itself as right. What might happen if you TRULY tried to prove yourself wrong? Challenge yourself. Think critically.
I however am leaving, but I leave you with one thought: science tries to prove itself wrong. Blind activism can only ever see itself as right. What might happen if you TRULY tried to prove yourself wrong? Challenge yourself. Think critically.
December 11, 2025 at 4:46 AM
You could still read the article.
I however am leaving, but I leave you with one thought: science tries to prove itself wrong. Blind activism can only ever see itself as right. What might happen if you TRULY tried to prove yourself wrong? Challenge yourself. Think critically.
I however am leaving, but I leave you with one thought: science tries to prove itself wrong. Blind activism can only ever see itself as right. What might happen if you TRULY tried to prove yourself wrong? Challenge yourself. Think critically.
Your inability to understand the answer does constitute and an excuse. The answer, again, is at the point it is able produce a functional gamete of the opposite sex; male or female. Binary.
December 11, 2025 at 4:34 AM
Your inability to understand the answer does constitute and an excuse. The answer, again, is at the point it is able produce a functional gamete of the opposite sex; male or female. Binary.
Some rare species can! Nature is amazing. It not possible in complex organisms like mammals, however.
December 11, 2025 at 4:29 AM
Some rare species can! Nature is amazing. It not possible in complex organisms like mammals, however.
Nature has no intent. It does have many predictable patterns. Ironically, ignoring the patterns and assuming intent (including botched intent) is both what creationist says AND what gender ideologists claim.
(A creationist would also refuse to read it preferring sanctimonious ignorance.)
(A creationist would also refuse to read it preferring sanctimonious ignorance.)
December 11, 2025 at 4:27 AM
Nature has no intent. It does have many predictable patterns. Ironically, ignoring the patterns and assuming intent (including botched intent) is both what creationist says AND what gender ideologists claim.
(A creationist would also refuse to read it preferring sanctimonious ignorance.)
(A creationist would also refuse to read it preferring sanctimonious ignorance.)
Answers to all your questions are contained within. You may choose to read it or you may choose to ignore the this nicely packaged information and remain biased and ignorant.
I, however, will not demand that you take any particular action. I refuse your demands of me or my time.
I, however, will not demand that you take any particular action. I refuse your demands of me or my time.
December 11, 2025 at 4:14 AM
Answers to all your questions are contained within. You may choose to read it or you may choose to ignore the this nicely packaged information and remain biased and ignorant.
I, however, will not demand that you take any particular action. I refuse your demands of me or my time.
I, however, will not demand that you take any particular action. I refuse your demands of me or my time.
Read it again. The question asked was about what constitutes sex *change*. Asked and answered. Sex change relies on the binary nature of sex, BUT the binary nature of sex does not rely on change, in fact change is very, very rare. Demarcation is a non factor.
December 11, 2025 at 3:46 AM
Read it again. The question asked was about what constitutes sex *change*. Asked and answered. Sex change relies on the binary nature of sex, BUT the binary nature of sex does not rely on change, in fact change is very, very rare. Demarcation is a non factor.
It does answer the question. The line is between fulfilling the role of a large gamete producer (female of the species) or small gamete producer (male). When scientists talk of organisms that ARE able to change sex, this is the criteria. It is certainly rare! And not possible for humans.
December 11, 2025 at 1:33 AM
It does answer the question. The line is between fulfilling the role of a large gamete producer (female of the species) or small gamete producer (male). When scientists talk of organisms that ARE able to change sex, this is the criteria. It is certainly rare! And not possible for humans.
Great question. And thankfully, in political contexts, biologists agree: In simple terms, it would been an organism that switches from producing a functional large gamete to producing a functional small gamete (or vice versa). This switch is not possible in complex organisms like mammals.
December 11, 2025 at 1:25 AM
Great question. And thankfully, in political contexts, biologists agree: In simple terms, it would been an organism that switches from producing a functional large gamete to producing a functional small gamete (or vice versa). This switch is not possible in complex organisms like mammals.
Who are you replying to? This has nothing to do with what I wrote.
What “definition”? What “excuse”?
But since you brought it up, there is NO evidence that sex is not binary. Denying the sex binary is like denying evolution; completely in contradiction of all evidence.
What “definition”? What “excuse”?
But since you brought it up, there is NO evidence that sex is not binary. Denying the sex binary is like denying evolution; completely in contradiction of all evidence.
December 11, 2025 at 1:17 AM
Who are you replying to? This has nothing to do with what I wrote.
What “definition”? What “excuse”?
But since you brought it up, there is NO evidence that sex is not binary. Denying the sex binary is like denying evolution; completely in contradiction of all evidence.
What “definition”? What “excuse”?
But since you brought it up, there is NO evidence that sex is not binary. Denying the sex binary is like denying evolution; completely in contradiction of all evidence.
Up is down. Right is wrong. Biological sex is a “meaningless essence” but objecting to men usurping the identity of the opposite sex (based on their metaphysical belief in innate gender) is egregious?
No. You are woefully misinformed and too captured by dogma and bias to see the truth. Goodbye.
No. You are woefully misinformed and too captured by dogma and bias to see the truth. Goodbye.
December 9, 2025 at 1:48 AM
Up is down. Right is wrong. Biological sex is a “meaningless essence” but objecting to men usurping the identity of the opposite sex (based on their metaphysical belief in innate gender) is egregious?
No. You are woefully misinformed and too captured by dogma and bias to see the truth. Goodbye.
No. You are woefully misinformed and too captured by dogma and bias to see the truth. Goodbye.
Oof. “Gender critical belief” is a bit like saying “atheist belief”—self contradictory. GCs DON’T believe in gender ideology/ the supremacy of gender so they have (gender non-belief) belief??
Non-belief is simply the default, not a belief in of itself. Impermissible manifestation of non-belief.
Non-belief is simply the default, not a belief in of itself. Impermissible manifestation of non-belief.
December 8, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Oof. “Gender critical belief” is a bit like saying “atheist belief”—self contradictory. GCs DON’T believe in gender ideology/ the supremacy of gender so they have (gender non-belief) belief??
Non-belief is simply the default, not a belief in of itself. Impermissible manifestation of non-belief.
Non-belief is simply the default, not a belief in of itself. Impermissible manifestation of non-belief.
hecheated.org/Total_result...
Just one the MANY areas of colonization. It doesn’t matter that we fought hard to get the very little we have; men are trying to take it anyway.
Just one the MANY areas of colonization. It doesn’t matter that we fought hard to get the very little we have; men are trying to take it anyway.
HECHEATED: Total Results - Males in Female Competition
A record of MALES who have robbed FEMALE athletes of success and opportunities in sport and the organizations who have helped them do so.
hecheated.org
December 8, 2025 at 5:34 PM
hecheated.org/Total_result...
Just one the MANY areas of colonization. It doesn’t matter that we fought hard to get the very little we have; men are trying to take it anyway.
Just one the MANY areas of colonization. It doesn’t matter that we fought hard to get the very little we have; men are trying to take it anyway.
Humans CAN’T change sex. Males are male their whole life. A male who says he is a woman is absolutely attempting to colonize the female identity because he taking something that doesn’t belong to him…But it’s even worse, he’s taking something that CAN’T belong to him and demanding everyone pretend.
December 8, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Humans CAN’T change sex. Males are male their whole life. A male who says he is a woman is absolutely attempting to colonize the female identity because he taking something that doesn’t belong to him…But it’s even worse, he’s taking something that CAN’T belong to him and demanding everyone pretend.
No. You are objectively mistaken and/or misunderstand what it would mean for an organism to change sex. No human, regardless of medical intervention, has changed sex. That is reality.
December 8, 2025 at 5:07 PM
No. You are objectively mistaken and/or misunderstand what it would mean for an organism to change sex. No human, regardless of medical intervention, has changed sex. That is reality.
There is not a single justifiable reason why some males should be allowed to appropriate the words and colonize the spaces, protections, and opportunities of all females. Not one.
December 8, 2025 at 3:03 AM
There is not a single justifiable reason why some males should be allowed to appropriate the words and colonize the spaces, protections, and opportunities of all females. Not one.
Medicine is science (usually—the atrocity that is GAC seems to contest that.) Nevertheless, humans changing sex is at best science FICTION. It’s never happened. To say it has is objectively false. A lifetime of hormones and surgeries can not turn a male into a female. It is impossible.
December 8, 2025 at 2:52 AM
Medicine is science (usually—the atrocity that is GAC seems to contest that.) Nevertheless, humans changing sex is at best science FICTION. It’s never happened. To say it has is objectively false. A lifetime of hormones and surgeries can not turn a male into a female. It is impossible.
No. Sex is immutable in humans. There’s really nothing more to say if you refuse to recognize that fact.
December 7, 2025 at 3:36 AM
No. Sex is immutable in humans. There’s really nothing more to say if you refuse to recognize that fact.