BOO UNTIL YOU ARE KICKED OUT. DO NOT LET HIM LIE. LET HIM BE THE PRESIDENT WHO REMOVED HALF OF CONGRESS DURING HIS SPEECH. @aoc.bsky.social
March 5, 2025 at 2:58 AM
BOO UNTIL YOU ARE KICKED OUT. DO NOT LET HIM LIE. LET HIM BE THE PRESIDENT WHO REMOVED HALF OF CONGRESS DURING HIS SPEECH. @aoc.bsky.social
LOL, take a page out of WaPo's book. good one
February 8, 2025 at 3:01 AM
LOL, take a page out of WaPo's book. good one
well fuckin said. also, the OP doesn't even make much sense, white nationalists fly the flag of said nation they are nationalists of, and police cars belonging to police forces in said nation have the flag of said nation. how are either of those indicative of anything other than allegiance?
February 8, 2025 at 3:00 AM
well fuckin said. also, the OP doesn't even make much sense, white nationalists fly the flag of said nation they are nationalists of, and police cars belonging to police forces in said nation have the flag of said nation. how are either of those indicative of anything other than allegiance?
The 3rd I don't agree with because you can make a criticism of Israeli policy by comparing it to the Nazis without having to apply the context of Israel being a Jewish state and the Nazis being antisemitic (e.g. this Israeli Policy is fascist, like this similar fascist policy of the Nazis).
November 21, 2024 at 5:26 AM
The 3rd I don't agree with because you can make a criticism of Israeli policy by comparing it to the Nazis without having to apply the context of Israel being a Jewish state and the Nazis being antisemitic (e.g. this Israeli Policy is fascist, like this similar fascist policy of the Nazis).
The 2nd one I don't agree with at all, that application of a double standard can easily be done without antisemitic sentiment; it can just be logically inconsistent for any number of reasons. Doing that doesn't require antisemitic intent and wont always have an antisemitic effect.
November 21, 2024 at 5:19 AM
The 2nd one I don't agree with at all, that application of a double standard can easily be done without antisemitic sentiment; it can just be logically inconsistent for any number of reasons. Doing that doesn't require antisemitic intent and wont always have an antisemitic effect.
The 1st one I would agree with if it was saying that claims that just the establishment State of Israel at all is racist are antisemitic, but it reads like criticizing the way the State of Israel was historically established as a racist endeavor would be antisemitic, which I don't agree with.
November 21, 2024 at 5:16 AM
The 1st one I would agree with if it was saying that claims that just the establishment State of Israel at all is racist are antisemitic, but it reads like criticizing the way the State of Israel was historically established as a racist endeavor would be antisemitic, which I don't agree with.
I think the 4th one is pretty reasonable. Characterizing Israel's or Israeli people's actions specifically using antisemitic symbolism would be antisemitic. The other ones I don't agree with.
November 21, 2024 at 5:15 AM
I think the 4th one is pretty reasonable. Characterizing Israel's or Israeli people's actions specifically using antisemitic symbolism would be antisemitic. The other ones I don't agree with.