Barbara🎗️
@barbara-raabe.bsky.social
Digital creator
Liberal Democrat
Jersey Girl
Liberal Democrat
Jersey Girl
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
It's downright pathetic that you can't understand that in swing states/districts, MOC have to make calculated decisions on certain votes or risk losing their seats.
It's just reality unless you want the GOP to have larger majorities.
You're not going to say anything intelligent or insightful, so:
👋👋
It's just reality unless you want the GOP to have larger majorities.
You're not going to say anything intelligent or insightful, so:
👋👋
a man in a suit and tie is smiling and saying i 'm finished with this guy
ALT: a man in a suit and tie is smiling and saying i 'm finished with this guy
media.tenor.com
January 30, 2026 at 2:04 AM
It's downright pathetic that you can't understand that in swing states/districts, MOC have to make calculated decisions on certain votes or risk losing their seats.
It's just reality unless you want the GOP to have larger majorities.
You're not going to say anything intelligent or insightful, so:
👋👋
It's just reality unless you want the GOP to have larger majorities.
You're not going to say anything intelligent or insightful, so:
👋👋
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
You didn't answer my question about whether you prefer Begich to Peltola, so I'll just assume you do.
Your naivety is laughable.
In the real world, some of the 213 House Democrats have to occasionally vote across party lines if they want their constituents to be happy & vote to re-elect them.
Your naivety is laughable.
In the real world, some of the 213 House Democrats have to occasionally vote across party lines if they want their constituents to be happy & vote to re-elect them.
January 30, 2026 at 1:55 AM
You didn't answer my question about whether you prefer Begich to Peltola, so I'll just assume you do.
Your naivety is laughable.
In the real world, some of the 213 House Democrats have to occasionally vote across party lines if they want their constituents to be happy & vote to re-elect them.
Your naivety is laughable.
In the real world, some of the 213 House Democrats have to occasionally vote across party lines if they want their constituents to be happy & vote to re-elect them.
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
It's not appeasement & it's clear from your comments that you don't understand politics-unless you'd like to see swing district Dem Reps lose to MAGA.
It's unbelievable that you can't understand such a simple concept.
Swing districts aren't safe blue districts.
To win, they need the moderate vote.
It's unbelievable that you can't understand such a simple concept.
Swing districts aren't safe blue districts.
To win, they need the moderate vote.
January 30, 2026 at 1:38 AM
It's not appeasement & it's clear from your comments that you don't understand politics-unless you'd like to see swing district Dem Reps lose to MAGA.
It's unbelievable that you can't understand such a simple concept.
Swing districts aren't safe blue districts.
To win, they need the moderate vote.
It's unbelievable that you can't understand such a simple concept.
Swing districts aren't safe blue districts.
To win, they need the moderate vote.
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
You lack the ability to think for yourself.
The 7 voted for a shitty bill & you'd rather see them lose the nomination to a "progressive" who'd lose in the general rather than acknowledge that it's better to have someone who votes with you 9/10+ of the time than a Republican.
Prefer him to Peltola?
The 7 voted for a shitty bill & you'd rather see them lose the nomination to a "progressive" who'd lose in the general rather than acknowledge that it's better to have someone who votes with you 9/10+ of the time than a Republican.
Prefer him to Peltola?
January 30, 2026 at 1:46 AM
You lack the ability to think for yourself.
The 7 voted for a shitty bill & you'd rather see them lose the nomination to a "progressive" who'd lose in the general rather than acknowledge that it's better to have someone who votes with you 9/10+ of the time than a Republican.
Prefer him to Peltola?
The 7 voted for a shitty bill & you'd rather see them lose the nomination to a "progressive" who'd lose in the general rather than acknowledge that it's better to have someone who votes with you 9/10+ of the time than a Republican.
Prefer him to Peltola?
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
It's not appeasement & at the very you're least naive.
They all know the bill goes to the Senate first where it'll be changed & unlike Reps in safe blue districts, they have to vote against their party sometimes or they'll lose their seats.
Any moderate Democrat beats a Republican.
Who'd you prefer?
They all know the bill goes to the Senate first where it'll be changed & unlike Reps in safe blue districts, they have to vote against their party sometimes or they'll lose their seats.
Any moderate Democrat beats a Republican.
Who'd you prefer?
January 30, 2026 at 1:23 AM
It's not appeasement & at the very you're least naive.
They all know the bill goes to the Senate first where it'll be changed & unlike Reps in safe blue districts, they have to vote against their party sometimes or they'll lose their seats.
Any moderate Democrat beats a Republican.
Who'd you prefer?
They all know the bill goes to the Senate first where it'll be changed & unlike Reps in safe blue districts, they have to vote against their party sometimes or they'll lose their seats.
Any moderate Democrat beats a Republican.
Who'd you prefer?
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
No Democrats are acting as though appeasement is the solution. From my perspective, you’re working for MAGA.
January 29, 2026 at 11:27 PM
No Democrats are acting as though appeasement is the solution. From my perspective, you’re working for MAGA.
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
There is no conciliation. You cannot profess your opinion without lying.
January 29, 2026 at 11:28 PM
There is no conciliation. You cannot profess your opinion without lying.
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
You’re the one ratfucking so no, we don’t have to treat you as a rational person.
January 29, 2026 at 11:28 PM
You’re the one ratfucking so no, we don’t have to treat you as a rational person.
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
Fuck Kanye in the past, today, and tomorrow. In 2005 he said George Bush doesn’t care about black people. Now George Bush can say the same thing about Kanye. It’s crazy seeing black people traffic in anti blackness for profit. Jewish people should not accept his apology either. He is not sincere!
January 27, 2026 at 5:20 PM
Fuck Kanye in the past, today, and tomorrow. In 2005 he said George Bush doesn’t care about black people. Now George Bush can say the same thing about Kanye. It’s crazy seeing black people traffic in anti blackness for profit. Jewish people should not accept his apology either. He is not sincere!
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
Doesn't he have a new album at the end of the week? His "apology" doesn't sound sincere at all to me.
January 27, 2026 at 5:08 PM
Doesn't he have a new album at the end of the week? His "apology" doesn't sound sincere at all to me.
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
The Ukraine war was started by vlad putin the dictator of Russia. Why are you helping the evil dictator?
January 26, 2026 at 2:31 PM
The Ukraine war was started by vlad putin the dictator of Russia. Why are you helping the evil dictator?
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
What a pinhead this guy is
January 24, 2026 at 4:03 AM
What a pinhead this guy is
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
bsky.app
January 24, 2026 at 4:09 AM
Reposted by Barbara🎗️
Guess it was something I said.
What a fucking🤡
What a fucking🤡
January 24, 2026 at 4:25 AM
Guess it was something I said.
What a fucking🤡
What a fucking🤡