Jeff Fields
@baritone.bsky.social
Professional classical baritone, IT Technical Lead for an Apple-centric IT firm. St. Paul, MN.
BTW, it's not "Biden's DoJ". The DoJ does not belong to the president, regardless of any misconceptions you might have due to the current fascist tyrant pretending that he owns DoJ.
December 26, 2025 at 1:33 AM
BTW, it's not "Biden's DoJ". The DoJ does not belong to the president, regardless of any misconceptions you might have due to the current fascist tyrant pretending that he owns DoJ.
Biden wasn't in charge of day-to-day decisions at DoJ. Because presidents are supposed to have ZERO involvement in such things. Why is it so hard to understand this?
This is not. Joe. Biden's. Fault. At all. In any way.
This is not. Joe. Biden's. Fault. At all. In any way.
December 26, 2025 at 1:32 AM
Biden wasn't in charge of day-to-day decisions at DoJ. Because presidents are supposed to have ZERO involvement in such things. Why is it so hard to understand this?
This is not. Joe. Biden's. Fault. At all. In any way.
This is not. Joe. Biden's. Fault. At all. In any way.
That's such a coincidence, because about 100 million Americans submitted a tip to themselves saying the exact same obvious thing.
December 26, 2025 at 1:31 AM
That's such a coincidence, because about 100 million Americans submitted a tip to themselves saying the exact same obvious thing.
We're probably just really really good LLMs.
December 25, 2025 at 4:48 AM
We're probably just really really good LLMs.
You're too smart to be spamming sloppy crap like this. You need to read more and talk less about this issue. The first and biggest error is that you are assuming that $4T figure is immutable and a permanent fact. It's not. It's the result of a bloated profit-motive system. Remove that system.
December 25, 2025 at 3:49 AM
You're too smart to be spamming sloppy crap like this. You need to read more and talk less about this issue. The first and biggest error is that you are assuming that $4T figure is immutable and a permanent fact. It's not. It's the result of a bloated profit-motive system. Remove that system.
Every time? Once would probably be enough. Two or three times, max.
December 13, 2025 at 9:08 AM
Every time? Once would probably be enough. Two or three times, max.
Trump tells extraordinarily obvious lies more often than most of us breathe. What you're talking about simply isn't a thing.
December 13, 2025 at 9:07 AM
Trump tells extraordinarily obvious lies more often than most of us breathe. What you're talking about simply isn't a thing.
Noem is small potatoes. We're not calling for "Admin figures" to be confronted—fuck Kristi Noem. We want THE ACTUAL PRESIDENT to be confronted. Over and over again, every times he steps WAY over the line. Which is quite often.
December 12, 2025 at 10:14 AM
Noem is small potatoes. We're not calling for "Admin figures" to be confronted—fuck Kristi Noem. We want THE ACTUAL PRESIDENT to be confronted. Over and over again, every times he steps WAY over the line. Which is quite often.
Confronting Leavitt would probably have no effect, just like you are saying.
Confronting Trump would be a totally different matter, and that's what needs to happen. He can't be allowed to keep calling reporters "piggy" and "stupid" and "terrible person" while lying. Not ok, can't be accepted.
Confronting Trump would be a totally different matter, and that's what needs to happen. He can't be allowed to keep calling reporters "piggy" and "stupid" and "terrible person" while lying. Not ok, can't be accepted.
December 12, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Confronting Leavitt would probably have no effect, just like you are saying.
Confronting Trump would be a totally different matter, and that's what needs to happen. He can't be allowed to keep calling reporters "piggy" and "stupid" and "terrible person" while lying. Not ok, can't be accepted.
Confronting Trump would be a totally different matter, and that's what needs to happen. He can't be allowed to keep calling reporters "piggy" and "stupid" and "terrible person" while lying. Not ok, can't be accepted.
We're talking about the TV show, I assume? We certainly can't be talking about the Trump Administration, because they have no actual law and order folks. Not really.
November 30, 2025 at 4:38 AM
We're talking about the TV show, I assume? We certainly can't be talking about the Trump Administration, because they have no actual law and order folks. Not really.
Or, "do you honestly believe that your childish personal attacks on me will distract me from trying to get an answer to my valid question, Mister President? If so, you are sadly mistaken. Now either answer my question or admit that you can't."
Any variant will do, really.
Any variant will do, really.
November 29, 2025 at 7:13 AM
Or, "do you honestly believe that your childish personal attacks on me will distract me from trying to get an answer to my valid question, Mister President? If so, you are sadly mistaken. Now either answer my question or admit that you can't."
Any variant will do, really.
Any variant will do, really.
Well, I tend to agree. But it might be even more effective without the f-bomb.
November 29, 2025 at 1:18 AM
Well, I tend to agree. But it might be even more effective without the f-bomb.
I still don't see why the point is gendered. The women are also complicit, in equal measure. Trump being a man doesn't really enter into it.
November 29, 2025 at 1:18 AM
I still don't see why the point is gendered. The women are also complicit, in equal measure. Trump being a man doesn't really enter into it.
If you think it's easy, then you start. Right now. You go out and risk your job. You take action. Yourself.
November 29, 2025 at 12:38 AM
If you think it's easy, then you start. Right now. You go out and risk your job. You take action. Yourself.
The time is coming, very soon now, when one, just one of these reporters will snap, and say, "I'm not stupid. I did my research, and you are a liar. You're not even a good liar." And then calmly repeat that he is a liar, over and over again. And Trump will crumble into dust.
November 29, 2025 at 12:37 AM
The time is coming, very soon now, when one, just one of these reporters will snap, and say, "I'm not stupid. I did my research, and you are a liar. You're not even a good liar." And then calmly repeat that he is a liar, over and over again. And Trump will crumble into dust.
Why would it have to be a male reporter?
November 29, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Why would it have to be a male reporter?
Some say there's no justice left in the world, but this proves there is.
November 28, 2025 at 10:45 AM
Some say there's no justice left in the world, but this proves there is.
Possibly the best magazine in the country. Definitely on the very short list.
November 27, 2025 at 8:08 PM
Possibly the best magazine in the country. Definitely on the very short list.
The main problem with this post is the phrase "Weiss thinks".
November 26, 2025 at 1:51 AM
The main problem with this post is the phrase "Weiss thinks".
Same ranking for me except that I would bump Rogue One up to #1.
November 25, 2025 at 10:42 PM
Same ranking for me except that I would bump Rogue One up to #1.
Let's not use the tendentious Republican misspelling.
It's Democratic leaders.
It's Democratic leaders.
November 20, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Let's not use the tendentious Republican misspelling.
It's Democratic leaders.
It's Democratic leaders.
Time for ABC to sue the fuck out of these criminals and make bank.
November 20, 2025 at 10:24 PM
Time for ABC to sue the fuck out of these criminals and make bank.
"More jobs" is meaningless anyway. That's all population growth, just like when he boasts about getting the "most votes ever".
November 19, 2025 at 10:37 PM
"More jobs" is meaningless anyway. That's all population growth, just like when he boasts about getting the "most votes ever".