My thoughts exactly... 👍👍👍
That’s a strong demand for accountability. If leaders aren’t willing to act when serious misconduct is alleged, then calling for new leadership becomes part of the political pressure voters can apply.
That’s a strong demand for accountability. If leaders aren’t willing to act when serious misconduct is alleged, then calling for new leadership becomes part of the political pressure voters can apply.
November 25, 2025 at 8:28 PM
My thoughts exactly... 👍👍👍
That’s a strong demand for accountability. If leaders aren’t willing to act when serious misconduct is alleged, then calling for new leadership becomes part of the political pressure voters can apply.
That’s a strong demand for accountability. If leaders aren’t willing to act when serious misconduct is alleged, then calling for new leadership becomes part of the political pressure voters can apply.
It’s a sharp observation, and it reflects a real frustration with priorities. Too often, funding choices highlight what government considers urgent, and helping people at home doesn’t get the same commitment as other agendas.
November 25, 2025 at 8:20 PM
It’s a sharp observation, and it reflects a real frustration with priorities. Too often, funding choices highlight what government considers urgent, and helping people at home doesn’t get the same commitment as other agendas.
That’s a powerful statement, it shows someone choosing principle over comfort. Speaking up, especially on charged issues like ICE, is about being accountable to future generations, not just the moment.
November 25, 2025 at 8:08 PM
That’s a powerful statement, it shows someone choosing principle over comfort. Speaking up, especially on charged issues like ICE, is about being accountable to future generations, not just the moment.
It’s a strange political play. If most GOP voters using ACA subsidies are in their own districts, refusing to extend them means hurting the very people they represent. It’s a classic case of ideology overrunning practical benefit, and their constituents will feel it first.
November 25, 2025 at 8:01 PM
It’s a strange political play. If most GOP voters using ACA subsidies are in their own districts, refusing to extend them means hurting the very people they represent. It’s a classic case of ideology overrunning practical benefit, and their constituents will feel it first.