You've stewed in the Reagan bs so long i.e. trickle down economics, gov't is bad, welfare queens are black women, LGBT rights are sinful, God supports American, that you can't quit it. Look what those beliefs got us.....a party that gave us Trump. Not someone who should be lecturing Dems.
November 2, 2025 at 3:19 AM
You've stewed in the Reagan bs so long i.e. trickle down economics, gov't is bad, welfare queens are black women, LGBT rights are sinful, God supports American, that you can't quit it. Look what those beliefs got us.....a party that gave us Trump. Not someone who should be lecturing Dems.
The fact that you use pro-choice Dems being the demise of the Dem party, when in fact Dem/GOP were equal on the issue til 1980, shows how far to the right the GOP has gone on social and now economic/foreign policy when the DNC has remained fairly static. Overton window.
November 2, 2025 at 3:09 AM
The fact that you use pro-choice Dems being the demise of the Dem party, when in fact Dem/GOP were equal on the issue til 1980, shows how far to the right the GOP has gone on social and now economic/foreign policy when the DNC has remained fairly static. Overton window.
Hum, wonder how long it will take for MAGA to start questioning whether JD Vance had Charlie Kirk off'd in order to marry his wife & improve odds of winning 2028? I mean, MAGA wouldn't be thrilled by a FLOTUS who's non-white/non-Christian.
October 31, 2025 at 1:10 AM
Hum, wonder how long it will take for MAGA to start questioning whether JD Vance had Charlie Kirk off'd in order to marry his wife & improve odds of winning 2028? I mean, MAGA wouldn't be thrilled by a FLOTUS who's non-white/non-Christian.
Yep, what most of us said. However, it's highly unlikely that flag officers need to sign these "new" ones and they find it unusual, if it's the same forms as before. I wouldn't give this admin any benefit of the doubt.
October 28, 2025 at 10:18 PM
Yep, what most of us said. However, it's highly unlikely that flag officers need to sign these "new" ones and they find it unusual, if it's the same forms as before. I wouldn't give this admin any benefit of the doubt.
10 yrs in the military, never signed an NDA. Did sign a form re not disclosing classified info outside normal channels and where established law allows.
October 28, 2025 at 10:09 PM
10 yrs in the military, never signed an NDA. Did sign a form re not disclosing classified info outside normal channels and where established law allows.
Interesting. So, my fellow rally attendees are terrorists. I mean, they include a former republican judge, doctors, nurses, veterans, current/retired law enforcement, electricians, plumbers, farmers, bakers, teachers, students......who knew. To the cruel ruler, all dissenters are terrorists.
October 17, 2025 at 2:47 AM
Interesting. So, my fellow rally attendees are terrorists. I mean, they include a former republican judge, doctors, nurses, veterans, current/retired law enforcement, electricians, plumbers, farmers, bakers, teachers, students......who knew. To the cruel ruler, all dissenters are terrorists.
The republicans do not know how to have civil discourse. They've gotten used to half truths, no truths and then shouting them at folks. The GOP needs to be dismantled and burnt to ashes and a new center right party started. This is just utter ignorance and madness.
October 10, 2025 at 3:01 PM
The republicans do not know how to have civil discourse. They've gotten used to half truths, no truths and then shouting them at folks. The GOP needs to be dismantled and burnt to ashes and a new center right party started. This is just utter ignorance and madness.
I bet you their friends and relatives are making them regret their decision. Btw, it was one of the first cases, if not the first, the grand jury heard. They were empaneled today.
October 10, 2025 at 3:47 AM
I bet you their friends and relatives are making them regret their decision. Btw, it was one of the first cases, if not the first, the grand jury heard. They were empaneled today.
fyi, federal gov't investigative agencies can get 'mail covers' and get copies of the outside of the envelope, ie the sender and the addressee. So, I'd forego putting a return address on the envelope.
October 1, 2025 at 4:12 PM
fyi, federal gov't investigative agencies can get 'mail covers' and get copies of the outside of the envelope, ie the sender and the addressee. So, I'd forego putting a return address on the envelope.