BC Court of Appeal
@bccourtofappeal.bsky.social
Official Bluesky of the BC Court of Appeal. Posts and reposts are for information only & are not intended as endorsements. Terms of use: https://shorturl.at/oQzY5
The Court found no error with the trial judge’s conclusion that the termination was valid and the respondent’s son had a good faith intention to make the property his primary residence after appropriate renovations had been completed (2/2).
December 12, 2025 at 5:30 PM
The Court found no error with the trial judge’s conclusion that the termination was valid and the respondent’s son had a good faith intention to make the property his primary residence after appropriate renovations had been completed (2/2).
The chambers judge found the applicant satisfied the merits and surrender threshold but failed to meet the public interest criterion (2/2).
December 11, 2025 at 4:30 PM
The chambers judge found the applicant satisfied the merits and surrender threshold but failed to meet the public interest criterion (2/2).
The judge found that due to the complexity of the trial and issues, the applicant meets the requirements of the Criminal Code, and appointing counsel is in the interests of justice (2/2).
December 10, 2025 at 4:31 PM
The judge found that due to the complexity of the trial and issues, the applicant meets the requirements of the Criminal Code, and appointing counsel is in the interests of justice (2/2).
The Court found the Board considered the applicable legal principles and all the circumstances of the case before deciding a hybrid sanction was not appropriate (2/2).
December 9, 2025 at 4:30 PM
The Court found the Board considered the applicable legal principles and all the circumstances of the case before deciding a hybrid sanction was not appropriate (2/2).
The Court found the judge applied the proper principles and did not err in her interpretation of Article 4.1(d) for share transfers to existing shareholders (2/2).
December 9, 2025 at 4:30 AM
The Court found the judge applied the proper principles and did not err in her interpretation of Article 4.1(d) for share transfers to existing shareholders (2/2).
The Court found the Tribunal’s decision declining to proceed with the complaint contained no reviewable error and the chambers judge selected and applied the correct standards of review. The process was fair and there was no reasonable apprehension of bias (2/2).
December 5, 2025 at 4:30 PM
The Court found the Tribunal’s decision declining to proceed with the complaint contained no reviewable error and the chambers judge selected and applied the correct standards of review. The process was fair and there was no reasonable apprehension of bias (2/2).
The Court found given that sufficient material facts were pleaded to allow the claim in civil conspiracy to proceed, there were sufficient material facts pleaded to allow the claims in inducing breach of contract and economic interference to proceed (2/2).
December 4, 2025 at 4:30 PM
The Court found given that sufficient material facts were pleaded to allow the claim in civil conspiracy to proceed, there were sufficient material facts pleaded to allow the claims in inducing breach of contract and economic interference to proceed (2/2).
The chambers judge failed to consider factors relevant to the exercise of his discretion, and the application for leave to appeal raised a question of procedural fairness, which is a question of law (2/2).
December 3, 2025 at 4:30 PM
The chambers judge failed to consider factors relevant to the exercise of his discretion, and the application for leave to appeal raised a question of procedural fairness, which is a question of law (2/2).
Please click here to register:
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
Judicial Law Clerk Program Information Session - In Coordination with the Black Law Student Associations at UVic, UBC, TRU
Upon submitting this form, you will receive a MS Teams link sent via the email you have provided 24 hours before the information session begins. Time of Session: 12:30pm - 1:30pm Date of Session:…
docs.google.com
December 2, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Please click here to register:
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
The chambers judge did not err in concluding that a summary trial was appropriate as the issue before her was narrow, and the appellant did not advance any compelling arguments on the merits of a full trial (2/2).
December 2, 2025 at 4:31 PM
The chambers judge did not err in concluding that a summary trial was appropriate as the issue before her was narrow, and the appellant did not advance any compelling arguments on the merits of a full trial (2/2).
The Court found the chambers judge did not decide the main issue at hand, focusing on the substance of the settlement agreement and consent order rather than whether they might be set aside (2/2).
December 1, 2025 at 4:30 PM
The Court found the chambers judge did not decide the main issue at hand, focusing on the substance of the settlement agreement and consent order rather than whether they might be set aside (2/2).
The Court found the chambers judge made errors in principle in his assessment of the interests of justice that warranted appellate intervention (2/2).
November 28, 2025 at 4:30 PM
The Court found the chambers judge made errors in principle in his assessment of the interests of justice that warranted appellate intervention (2/2).