Even if he did sustain some kind of injury in the incident, it is still Officer-Created Jeopardy. Officers cannot place themselves in jeopardy - especially when violating policy by doing so - then use that jeopardy to justify deadly force. "Moment of threat" defenses are no longer valid, per SCOTUS.

It’s still Officer Created Jeopardy. He placed himself in the path of a moving vehicle, creating the jeopardy he used to justify killing her. That’s still murder.

Interestingly enough, Officer Created Jeopardy still applies here. Even if he was hit by the car, he still placed himself in its path, creating the jeopardy he used to justify killing her. Still murder.

Dollars to donuts, someone had to explain that to Trump beforehand.

www.axios.com/2025/09/13/k...

References to a video game -- Helldivers 2 -- apparently popular among some groypers.
Sorry, Charlie, I guess your martyrdom and sainthood will have to be cancelled. You were just another senseless victim of the gun violence for which you advocated.

The groypers have been feuding with Charlie Kirk and TPUSA for years, apparently about just how bigoted a person has to be in order to be a "true conservative", which the groypers claim Kirk was not. The so-called "anti-fascist, trans" references engraved on the ammunition?

I think judges have limited involvement in grand jury proceedings. If the US Attorney (appointed by Trump) is going to pursue charges against the agents, it is doubtful anything will happen to them from that avenue. Cases should be brought by those whose rights are being violated.

I didn’t say I agreed with it. I don’t agree with any of it.

They would still charge you with obstruction of justice, which would be a greater charge than the damage.

Of course they cheated you, dumbass. That's what they do.

You expect her to know who pays her salary? Come on, man...😂

Also consistent with falling...

Sorry folks, but when the stakes are literally everything, "I couldn't" or "it was too hard" aren't going to find a ton of sympathy. Citizens: FIND A WAY. Democrats: FIND A WAY TO HELP THEM. Seriously, this country is on the brink of collapse because a third of the country has surrendered.

When Abbott won by 900k and Trump by 1.5 million and 7 million voters stayed home, there is a problem.

It's not just gerrymandering. Pick a red state, any red state and look at the number of registered voters who didn't vote (registered voters minus total votes cast). The look at the margin of victory by Republicans in their state. Red states are red because often a third of their voters stay home.

If those people didn't vote for this, then why didn't they vote? Why did 1/3 of Texas voters stay home in 2022 and 2024 allowing Abbott and Trump to win by margins that could have been easily overcome? By not voting, THEY VOTED FOR THIS.

By how not good English you speak, I bet you are a Russian troll

Umm...ICE wasn't there for the weed, Cletus...