@bendinovelli.bsky.social
150 followers 320 following 58 posts
Academic Fellow, Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator (@vandylaw.bsky.social). Research networks, platforms, and utilities. Views are my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted
asad09.bsky.social
A few trillion-dollar companies now comprise an AI oligopoly. Nvidia's announcement to invest $100B in OpenAI makes things worse. As I say in TIME, vertical integration is about money, control, and power. Policymakers should reject such combinations. time.com/7322418/chat...
We Need to Break Up Big AI Before It Breaks Us
When the same few companies own the entire tech stack, they stop competing and start colluding.
time.com
Reposted
narosenblum.bsky.social
It just cannot be emphasized enough, as the differential treatment of Slaughter and Cook illustrate yet again, the Roberts Court’s vision of separation of powers is not the Founders’, nor the Constitution’s, but just their own. This isn’t necessarily bad; it’s just disingenuous. (1/2)
bendinovelli.bsky.social
Paper is here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.....

Relatedly, I'm on the law school job market (for financial institutions, business ass'ns, contracts, regulated industries, and communications law). Would appreciate your help to spread the word (especially if you enjoyed the paper)! 8/8
The Myth of Credit Card Competition
<p>You pay an invisible tax every time you swipe your credit card to pay—whether to buy groceries, grab a coffee, or access transportation.  Credit card co
papers.ssrn.com
bendinovelli.bsky.social
Instead, I argue that a more promising approach is to regulate swipe fees. Payment networks are vital economic infrastructure, and we should treat them as such. Rate regulation is also not novel. We've done it before with debit cards (Durbin Amendment) and checks. 7/8
bendinovelli.bsky.social
And merchants are heavily incentivized to bear these fees (rather than surcharge consumers or only accept lower-fee cards). Today, many people use high-fee cards and expect them to be accepted. Merchants don't want to dissuade those card users from spending at their stores. 6/8
bendinovelli.bsky.social
Credit card networks are engaged in a rewards rat race (cash back, airline miles, and lounge access, oh my!). To attract more cardholders to use their cards over others’ cards, networks are incentivized to raise swipe fees to fund more rewards. 5/8
bendinovelli.bsky.social
The "myth" is that more competition (e.g., surcharging, more networks, multi-routing) will reduce prices and regressivity. Many blame the legal doctrine for these solutions' inefficacy to date. But I argue the problem is more fundamental: More competition likely won't work. 4/8
bendinovelli.bsky.social
In 2024, U.S. businesses paid $148bn in 💳swipe fees (on the same order of magnitude as Trump's additional tariff revenues👀). These fees are much higher than the cost of service and disproportionately borne by lower-income consumers and smaller merchants. 3/8
bendinovelli.bsky.social
Every time you swipe your credit card to pay—whether to buy groceries, grab a coffee, or hail an uber—you pay a small, invisible tax called a "swipe fee." This fee is charged to the merchant, who in turn raises its prices to recover these fees. 2/8
bendinovelli.bsky.social
Excited to share that my job talk paper, The Myth of Credit Card Competition, is forthcoming in Vanderbilt Law Review!

I explore the limits of competition (through antitrust, consumer law, or regulation) as a solution to high and regressive swipe fees in the credit card payments market. 1/8
Reposted
grahamsteele.bsky.social
Some were sanguine that the Fed’s structure meant the Fed system could remain independent even if Trump gained control of the Board.

But this excellent piece shows how far Trump and his allies could go.

These scenarios would have been unthinkable a few months ago.
www.nytimes.com/2025/08/31/b...
Trump’s Plan to Pack the Fed With Loyalists
www.nytimes.com
Reposted
justmoney.bsky.social
📢More scholarship! @bendinovelli.bsky.social's timely paper revisits the Federal Reserve's ostensibly unique status among administrative agencies. It examines SCOTUS' attempt to except the Fed from case law limiting agency independence, with implications for Fed Governors' legal removal protections.
Current ScholarshipThe Federal Reserve Exception
Benjamin Dinovelli
justmoney.org
Reposted
joshchafetz.bsky.social
1/2 Trump should absolutely not be able to fire Lisa Cook.

But this is because he should not be able to fire anyone with statutory tenure protections.
Reposted
patsobkowski.com
Similar to Alan, my parents adopted me from South Korea when I was a baby. I have no recollection of Seoul or my biological mother. I also do not know her name or have any details.

To echo: if birthright citizenship becomes a patchwork right, what’s someone like me to do?
aselrod.bsky.social
I was adopted via closed adoption, born in North Carolina.

It was closed so I have no knowledge of or access to my biological mother’s details. It also means my biological mother isn’t on my birth certificate.

So if birthright citizenship becomes a patchwork right, what’s someone like me to do?
Reposted
weightman.bsky.social
🚨 Very excited to share that my note, Municipalities and the Banking Franchise, is officially out in the @stanlrev.bsky.social! The piece explores the role local governments can play in building a more democratic financial system. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... 1/10
Reposted
bhighsmith.bsky.social
The final version of my job market paper—about the strategies that have facilitated localized corporate domination at different points in our history—is now out. I'm so grateful to the SLR team and everyone else whose feedback has shaped this along the way! www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/articl...
bendinovelli.bsky.social
But I thought the Fed was “a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States”...?
bendinovelli.bsky.social
Ty and yes! Recognize the term “abundance” is broad and means diff things to diff ppl. But to your point, (at least w/r/t broadband) the debate felt myopically focused on “procedural barriers” for subsidies (and debating if duped dems, rapacious reps, corrupt capitalists, or a mix were responsible)
bendinovelli.bsky.social
Thank you for reading / highly recommending my piece, @lsolum.bsky.social!
lsolum.bsky.social
Dinovelli on the Federal Reserve and Removal, buff.ly/iort3UT - Benjamin Dinovelli (Vanderbilt Law School) has posted The Federal Reserve Exception on SSRN.
buff.ly
bendinovelli.bsky.social
Thank you for the very kind words! And kudos are owed to @giladedelman.bsky.social (who was extremely helpful in making our ideas sharper and stronger)
Reposted
theatlantic.com
The failure to deploy rural broadband has become synonymous with excessive bureaucracy, Asad Ramzanali and Benjamin Dinovelli write. The real story is more complicated:
Red Tape Isn’t the Only Reason America Can’t Build
The failure to deploy rural broadband has become synonymous with excessive bureaucracy. The real story is more complicated.
bit.ly