Josh Chafetz
@joshchafetz.bsky.social
Agnes Williams Sesquicentennial Professor of Law and Politics, Georgetown Law: https://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/josh-chafetz/
Author, most recently, of _Congress's Constitution_: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0300248334/
Author, most recently, of _Congress's Constitution_: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0300248334/
Pinned
Josh Chafetz
@joshchafetz.bsky.social
· Nov 18
Congress's Constitution: Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers: Chafetz, Josh: 9780300248333: Amazon.com: Books
Congress's Constitution: Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers [Chafetz, Josh] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Congress's Constitution: Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers
www.amazon.com
Hi new followers!
If you happen to be interested in the separation of powers, Congress, government shutdowns, contempt of Congress, the filibuster, and more, have I got the book for you! www.amazon.com/dp/0300248334/
If you happen to be interested in the separation of powers, Congress, government shutdowns, contempt of Congress, the filibuster, and more, have I got the book for you! www.amazon.com/dp/0300248334/
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
When you get visited by three Puerto Rican ghosts
February 9, 2026 at 11:05 PM
When you get visited by three Puerto Rican ghosts
Really good sleep blep
February 10, 2026 at 3:31 AM
Really good sleep blep
this is the only olympics post I will be needing this year thank you
i can tell in my heart if the ice dancers are in love
February 10, 2026 at 3:29 AM
this is the only olympics post I will be needing this year thank you
The fact that her reaction is almost certainly opportunistic makes this more, not less, significant.
GOP Sen Lummis says she’s changed her mind after the new Epstein revelations today: “Initially my reaction to all this was, I don’t care. I don’t see what the big deal is. But now I see what the big deal is. The members of Congress who were pushing this were not wrong!”
February 10, 2026 at 1:59 AM
The fact that her reaction is almost certainly opportunistic makes this more, not less, significant.
This is his “one of my hoomans is out of town and my other hooman has yet to give me second bribe treats after second dinner” forlorn look
February 10, 2026 at 1:43 AM
This is his “one of my hoomans is out of town and my other hooman has yet to give me second bribe treats after second dinner” forlorn look
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
I think we need more judgey signals:
"Somehow disapproved only on other grounds in"
"Shade thrown in"
"See to believe"
"ill-considered accord"
"Somehow disapproved only on other grounds in"
"Shade thrown in"
"See to believe"
"ill-considered accord"
That's the same article in which I made up a new Bluebook signal ...
February 9, 2026 at 11:45 PM
I think we need more judgey signals:
"Somehow disapproved only on other grounds in"
"Shade thrown in"
"See to believe"
"ill-considered accord"
"Somehow disapproved only on other grounds in"
"Shade thrown in"
"See to believe"
"ill-considered accord"
That's the same article in which I made up a new Bluebook signal ...
February 9, 2026 at 11:33 PM
That's the same article in which I made up a new Bluebook signal ...
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
This paper has placed with Columbia. Its little sibling article is still up for grabs for the enterprising law journal! They are deeply intertwined and recast the history of American admin law.
February 9, 2026 at 5:09 PM
This paper has placed with Columbia. Its little sibling article is still up for grabs for the enterprising law journal! They are deeply intertwined and recast the history of American admin law.
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
Yep. Many of us who weren't sufficiently Trump-curious had to find other places to work.
The libertarian movement had one job, and it failed, and now it wants credit for success.
The libertarian movement had one job, and it failed, and now it wants credit for success.
Yes, some libertarians *did* try to warn you about Trump. But you canceled them for it.
February 9, 2026 at 2:54 PM
Yep. Many of us who weren't sufficiently Trump-curious had to find other places to work.
The libertarian movement had one job, and it failed, and now it wants credit for success.
The libertarian movement had one job, and it failed, and now it wants credit for success.
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
JUST IN: DOJ is trying to help Steve Bannon erase his conviction for defying a subpoena from the Jan. 6 committee. Motion has no career prosecutor on it, just signed by US Attorney Pirro. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
February 9, 2026 at 7:11 PM
JUST IN: DOJ is trying to help Steve Bannon erase his conviction for defying a subpoena from the Jan. 6 committee. Motion has no career prosecutor on it, just signed by US Attorney Pirro. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
people sincerely committed to libertarianism as a philosophy did in fact clock Trump from the outset, and they have been right all along. libertarianism as a coalition partner within conservatism went along for the ride.
February 9, 2026 at 5:58 PM
people sincerely committed to libertarianism as a philosophy did in fact clock Trump from the outset, and they have been right all along. libertarianism as a coalition partner within conservatism went along for the ride.
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
this and other (correct) reactions to this piece really underscore the distinction between ideologies as political philosophies and ideologies as coalitions of policy demanders
Yes, some of us did, but the libertarians at Reason were not prominent among them, except for the one who got fired for it.
February 9, 2026 at 5:55 PM
this and other (correct) reactions to this piece really underscore the distinction between ideologies as political philosophies and ideologies as coalitions of policy demanders
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
I don't have a publicist, therefore I am the publicist. New website for my forthcoming book. Please especially check out the Author Q&A at the end of the page (Why did i write the book? Who's it for?. Journos, pod-casters, museums can find my contact info & how to obtain a bound review copy. 1/
Book - Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship — Anna O. Law
www.annaolaw.com
February 9, 2026 at 3:02 PM
I don't have a publicist, therefore I am the publicist. New website for my forthcoming book. Please especially check out the Author Q&A at the end of the page (Why did i write the book? Who's it for?. Journos, pod-casters, museums can find my contact info & how to obtain a bound review copy. 1/
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
Reached out to Ed Martin to ask if he'd comprehended that this was satire, and asked him whether he's even seen Arrested Development before. Will report back if he responds.
February 9, 2026 at 6:30 PM
Reached out to Ed Martin to ask if he'd comprehended that this was satire, and asked him whether he's even seen Arrested Development before. Will report back if he responds.
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
Reason publishes how its staff are voting. Which is a kind of admirably honest exercise, I suppose. But it rather undercuts "I told you so" if your answer was this.
In all they had twelve third-party voters, six non-voters, three Harris, two write-ins, and two who said undecided but maybe Trump.
In all they had twelve third-party voters, six non-voters, three Harris, two write-ins, and two who said undecided but maybe Trump.
February 9, 2026 at 5:57 PM
Reason publishes how its staff are voting. Which is a kind of admirably honest exercise, I suppose. But it rather undercuts "I told you so" if your answer was this.
In all they had twelve third-party voters, six non-voters, three Harris, two write-ins, and two who said undecided but maybe Trump.
In all they had twelve third-party voters, six non-voters, three Harris, two write-ins, and two who said undecided but maybe Trump.
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
Our fellow @bdgesq.bsky.social helped design the California wealth tax now being protested by the pro-billionaire advocates.
Last month, he laid out a national approach to taxing extreme wealth—so public services can be sustainably funded.
Because the tax code clearly isn’t working as intended.
Last month, he laid out a national approach to taxing extreme wealth—so public services can be sustainably funded.
Because the tax code clearly isn’t working as intended.
How to Tax the Ultrarich
Learn about the Fair Share Tax (FAST), a practical, constitutionally sound plan to tax the ultrarich, close loopholes, and prevent dynastic wealth accumulation.
rooseveltinstitute.org
February 9, 2026 at 5:53 PM
Our fellow @bdgesq.bsky.social helped design the California wealth tax now being protested by the pro-billionaire advocates.
Last month, he laid out a national approach to taxing extreme wealth—so public services can be sustainably funded.
Because the tax code clearly isn’t working as intended.
Last month, he laid out a national approach to taxing extreme wealth—so public services can be sustainably funded.
Because the tax code clearly isn’t working as intended.
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
Footage taken from inside Trump’s Super Bowl party at his Mar-a-Lago golf club showed the president and his guests watching Bad Bunny’s halftime show rather than TPUSA’s night of Jesus Christ, Kid Rock, and country music. trib.al/ivGSXQ3
February 9, 2026 at 5:18 PM
Footage taken from inside Trump’s Super Bowl party at his Mar-a-Lago golf club showed the president and his guests watching Bad Bunny’s halftime show rather than TPUSA’s night of Jesus Christ, Kid Rock, and country music. trib.al/ivGSXQ3
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
Carjackings in DC (and overall) have fallen by a remarkable amount: open.substack.com/pub/jasher/p/carjackings-have-fallen-an-incredible
February 9, 2026 at 5:12 PM
Carjackings in DC (and overall) have fallen by a remarkable amount: open.substack.com/pub/jasher/p/carjackings-have-fallen-an-incredible
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
1/x Really delighted to say that my coauthored piece with @jedshug.bsky.social, “Quasi-Judicial: A History and Tradition” just landed with the Columbia Law Review. We really appreciate the editors’ hard work! This is a piece that retells the story of American admin law and Humphrey’s Executor.
February 9, 2026 at 2:54 PM
1/x Really delighted to say that my coauthored piece with @jedshug.bsky.social, “Quasi-Judicial: A History and Tradition” just landed with the Columbia Law Review. We really appreciate the editors’ hard work! This is a piece that retells the story of American admin law and Humphrey’s Executor.
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
Doing Con Law The Right Way.
Today in Con Law I: Prigg v. Pennsylvania, Frederick Douglass's Fourth of July oration, and the Seneca Falls Declaration.
February 9, 2026 at 1:56 PM
Doing Con Law The Right Way.
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
I'm convinced AI is our generation's radium - a discovery with genuinely useful applications in specific, controlled circumstances that we stupidly put in everything from kid's toys to toothpaste until we realised the harm far too late where future generations will ask if we were out of our minds.
February 8, 2026 at 10:23 PM
I'm convinced AI is our generation's radium - a discovery with genuinely useful applications in specific, controlled circumstances that we stupidly put in everything from kid's toys to toothpaste until we realised the harm far too late where future generations will ask if we were out of our minds.
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
My paper, Habeas and the 1948 Judicial Code, is forthcoming in the Stanford Law Review (@stanlrev.bsky.social).
I argue that the 1948 Judicial Code, not the 1867 Habeas Corpus Act, should be the statutory focus for inquiry into the scope of habeas review.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
I argue that the 1948 Judicial Code, not the 1867 Habeas Corpus Act, should be the statutory focus for inquiry into the scope of habeas review.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
February 9, 2026 at 1:18 PM
My paper, Habeas and the 1948 Judicial Code, is forthcoming in the Stanford Law Review (@stanlrev.bsky.social).
I argue that the 1948 Judicial Code, not the 1867 Habeas Corpus Act, should be the statutory focus for inquiry into the scope of habeas review.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
I argue that the 1948 Judicial Code, not the 1867 Habeas Corpus Act, should be the statutory focus for inquiry into the scope of habeas review.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Today in Con Law I: Prigg v. Pennsylvania, Frederick Douglass's Fourth of July oration, and the Seneca Falls Declaration.
February 9, 2026 at 1:10 PM
Today in Con Law I: Prigg v. Pennsylvania, Frederick Douglass's Fourth of July oration, and the Seneca Falls Declaration.
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
Gov. Wes Moore (D-MD) says he was uninvited from a bipartisan White House dinner for governors
"As the nation’s only Black governor, I can’t ignore that being singled out for exclusion from this bipartisan tradition carries an added weight — whether that was the intent or not"
"As the nation’s only Black governor, I can’t ignore that being singled out for exclusion from this bipartisan tradition carries an added weight — whether that was the intent or not"
February 8, 2026 at 2:47 PM
Gov. Wes Moore (D-MD) says he was uninvited from a bipartisan White House dinner for governors
"As the nation’s only Black governor, I can’t ignore that being singled out for exclusion from this bipartisan tradition carries an added weight — whether that was the intent or not"
"As the nation’s only Black governor, I can’t ignore that being singled out for exclusion from this bipartisan tradition carries an added weight — whether that was the intent or not"