The second he loses the ability to sign his name (a coma, stroke paralysis, whatever), that's when he'll be abandoned by everyone except the healthcare professionals who are obligated to be there.

Powerful people like that usually die of old age, in the comfort of a deathbed.

But because Trump is a miserable prick, he won't be surrounded by loved ones, but by people who want things from him or stand to lose something by his spite.

I guess the era of tourism in the US is over?

(even if they wanted to change anything, I mean)

It's really hard for them to come up with something when their campaign donors pay them not to change anything...

Ooh! I wanna watch this! Where are you watching it?

To think I loved him in The Count of Monte Cristo... ugh....

With Democrats like these, who needs republicans?

Congratulations! 👏 👏 👏 🎉

I hadn't heard of this before reading your post, so thanks for putting this on my radar! I like the idea in principle of having canadian data stored on canadian servers. I'll need to look into the team to see what they're all about.

There's only 2 problems with this line of thinking.

One, the GOP is acting like there will never be a transfer of power again (they might be right on this point).

And two, you assume Democrats are not collaborators in this regime and will show some courage and prosecute (they won't).

Yeah, it's strangely-worded, right? I know that Magic is usually very careful with its wording, but I honestly don't see the difference in this case between "whenever one or more" and "whenever"...

Why is this card worded "whenever one or more" instead of simply "whenever", if every time a land enters the graveyard from the library it goes into play?

Usually the "one or more" is meant to signify that something triggers once in response to something else.

I'm confused... why is "Venezuela" put on the same level as actual crises like "AI", "Health", and "Climate"? Venezuela is a manufactured crisis to distract, these other things are real problems that no government is taking seriously.

People deserve low-cost housing in Montreal. Eliminating lease transfers is nothing but cruelty.

In 2008, I had a 2 1/2 on Stanley street, just south of Dr. Penfield. It was a lease-transfer of a lease-transfer of a lease-transfer. The rent was $700.
It was still expensive, given I was paid shit wages at the time. But it was way more affordable than what my friends had.