You conflate drone policies at a university with no fly zones.
Refuse to do anything but insult me instead of providing context or corrections.
And call it a bad thing I didn’t know the context after you didn’t give it.
You sound fun at policy parties.
You conflate drone policies at a university with no fly zones.
Refuse to do anything but insult me instead of providing context or corrections.
And call it a bad thing I didn’t know the context after you didn’t give it.
You sound fun at policy parties.
None of which relates to no drone zones though.
None of which relates to no drone zones though.
Totally open to corrections to my assumptions! I just think the “no drone zone” is a funny phenomenon. Literally an entire FAQ dedicated to the FAA telling local/state governments to eat shit.
Totally open to corrections to my assumptions! I just think the “no drone zone” is a funny phenomenon. Literally an entire FAQ dedicated to the FAA telling local/state governments to eat shit.
Outside of USCG bases SF and Alameda (covered under DHS NSUFR flight restrictions), looks like it’s pretty free skies!
It’s all Texas Oil Rules, but upside down. Except when the FAA says otherwise. But mostly they leave it to trespass law.
Outside of USCG bases SF and Alameda (covered under DHS NSUFR flight restrictions), looks like it’s pretty free skies!
It’s all Texas Oil Rules, but upside down. Except when the FAA says otherwise. But mostly they leave it to trespass law.
Local entities can’t use no fly zones, only the FAA in conjunction with the entity that needs them. No drone zone signs aren’t real. Easy pass.
The second is, that while you can’t get close, nothing is stopping you from having a really big collector. Get creative.
Local entities can’t use no fly zones, only the FAA in conjunction with the entity that needs them. No drone zone signs aren’t real. Easy pass.
The second is, that while you can’t get close, nothing is stopping you from having a really big collector. Get creative.