Because these sites exist for one reason only. To trick googles algorithm to promote them. They do that by making the timestamp recent, and parroting the content they found elsewhere.
Also, the most reputable sources is often telling Google to stay away from their content.
Also, the most reputable sources is often telling Google to stay away from their content.
December 20, 2025 at 1:39 PM
Because these sites exist for one reason only. To trick googles algorithm to promote them. They do that by making the timestamp recent, and parroting the content they found elsewhere.
Also, the most reputable sources is often telling Google to stay away from their content.
Also, the most reputable sources is often telling Google to stay away from their content.
Chinese ownership, ironically enough. Given the deal with Amazon was blocked. Presumably it would have been a lot better to let Amazon buy them.
December 17, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Chinese ownership, ironically enough. Given the deal with Amazon was blocked. Presumably it would have been a lot better to let Amazon buy them.
I wonder if we will start seeing robots now starting to empty themselves mid-clean
- patents.google.com/patent/US874...
- patents.google.com/patent/US949...
- patents.google.com/patent/US874...
- patents.google.com/patent/US949...
US8742926B2 - Debris monitoring
- Google Patents
patents.google.com
December 17, 2025 at 7:38 PM
I wonder if we will start seeing robots now starting to empty themselves mid-clean
- patents.google.com/patent/US874...
- patents.google.com/patent/US949...
- patents.google.com/patent/US874...
- patents.google.com/patent/US949...
I doubt it. As it did not remove any of the forks. The full history is easily discoverable by a few clicks today.
Instead, this seems like a political protest against AI and everything AI stands for.
Instead, this seems like a political protest against AI and everything AI stands for.
December 17, 2025 at 5:41 PM
I doubt it. As it did not remove any of the forks. The full history is easily discoverable by a few clicks today.
Instead, this seems like a political protest against AI and everything AI stands for.
Instead, this seems like a political protest against AI and everything AI stands for.
I looked into it a bit more and it appears they are not dogfooding the rust version when they build their own packages. This was a bit disappointing as I was expecting they build all packages with the default coreutils.
December 9, 2025 at 12:08 PM
I looked into it a bit more and it appears they are not dogfooding the rust version when they build their own packages. This was a bit disappointing as I was expecting they build all packages with the default coreutils.
Luckily, it is somewhat hard to find good examples of reverted features, but there are two pretty big ones.
- www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-...
- www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-...
- www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-...
- www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-...
December 9, 2025 at 4:02 AM
Luckily, it is somewhat hard to find good examples of reverted features, but there are two pretty big ones.
- www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-...
- www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-...
- www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-...
- www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-...
The thing is, .10 is their experimental release. It is not intended for production on important systems that can’t be reinstalled easily. It often test things out, and prioritize «new packages» over stability. All you need to do is to stick to .04, and this will not happen.
December 9, 2025 at 3:08 AM
The thing is, .10 is their experimental release. It is not intended for production on important systems that can’t be reinstalled easily. It often test things out, and prioritize «new packages» over stability. All you need to do is to stick to .04, and this will not happen.
Its extra annoying since it works fine in the spotlight search. At least sometimes, if your lucky. It even lets me search using the English name even though I’m on a Norwegian iPhone.
Inside settings however, none of that works.
I’m shocked that this stuff made it trough QA
Inside settings however, none of that works.
I’m shocked that this stuff made it trough QA
December 5, 2025 at 10:47 PM
Its extra annoying since it works fine in the spotlight search. At least sometimes, if your lucky. It even lets me search using the English name even though I’m on a Norwegian iPhone.
Inside settings however, none of that works.
I’m shocked that this stuff made it trough QA
Inside settings however, none of that works.
I’m shocked that this stuff made it trough QA
I guess this code is about proving a point? As I don’t see the advantage the code in new() nor eq(). In the real world, would these actually be faster in any way?
December 2, 2025 at 10:47 AM
I guess this code is about proving a point? As I don’t see the advantage the code in new() nor eq(). In the real world, would these actually be faster in any way?
Wouldn’t the text as written imply aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines prevent autism, which I assume is wrong. So there is an accuracy issue here
November 26, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Wouldn’t the text as written imply aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines prevent autism, which I assume is wrong. So there is an accuracy issue here
Its not that simple. It is also supposed to generate 76% less output tokens. Which in theory means you can use it 4x longer. So you can use it 12x longer than before for the same price
Or so they claim.
Or so they claim.
November 25, 2025 at 6:00 AM
Its not that simple. It is also supposed to generate 76% less output tokens. Which in theory means you can use it 4x longer. So you can use it 12x longer than before for the same price
Or so they claim.
Or so they claim.