Good luck, man.

I'll take it.

Happy to connect you if interested, Pamela! Let me know.

My presentation and rebuttal to opposing parties can be viewed here -
youtube.com/watch?v=Qdvq... beginning at 2:11:00.

Grateful as always to our client and to the full consultant team for their commitment to delivering high-quality, context-sensitive rental housing.

Projects like this demonstrate how gentle density can fit seamlessly into existing neighbourhoods.

Huge thank-you to the Committee Members for their thoughtful review, and to City Planning, Urban Forestry, and Transportation Services for their constructive feedback throughout the process.

Collaboration matters — and it showed here.

This approval is especially meaningful because it appears to be one of the first Major Streets applications to receive support from a Committee of Adjustment in Toronto.

A promising sign that this new policy tool is beginning to take effect.

The project is a 3-storey, 10-unit purpose-built rental building on a Major Street — exactly the kind of small-scale, well-designed housing the City envisioned when it created the new Major Streets framework.

Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.

Hahaha

I agree. My only hope is that all politicians and political staff representing the Former City of Toronto and East York agree to work together on this.

It happened with laneway suites before being expanded city-wide, and it happened again with sixplexes. In both cases, there was coordination to extend permissions to the former City of Toronto and East York at a minimum. It remains to be seen if that same approach will be applied here.

To be fair, Architects can be outstanding story tellers. I often tell planning students they can learn from Architects in this respect.

This turned out quite well.

Architects do not know how to write. Planners know how to write.

Thanks Dan!