William B. Hammert
@blakeham.bsky.social
University of Mississippi
#OleMissMuscle
#OleMissMuscle
Reposted by William B. Hammert
Our letter to editor about Caldwell et al (J Appl Physiol 139: 1220–1227, 2025) is published: journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10....
There seemed misconceptions about variance comparison stats. We also commented on the author's “SD of treatment effects”. Suppl stuff: zenodo.org/records/1777...
There seemed misconceptions about variance comparison stats. We also commented on the author's “SD of treatment effects”. Suppl stuff: zenodo.org/records/1777...
journals.physiology.org
January 9, 2026 at 9:01 AM
Our letter to editor about Caldwell et al (J Appl Physiol 139: 1220–1227, 2025) is published: journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10....
There seemed misconceptions about variance comparison stats. We also commented on the author's “SD of treatment effects”. Suppl stuff: zenodo.org/records/1777...
There seemed misconceptions about variance comparison stats. We also commented on the author's “SD of treatment effects”. Suppl stuff: zenodo.org/records/1777...
Task-specific strength gains reflect increases measured in the same movements that were trained and are greatest when training (“practicing”) with heavier loads. Whether the same is true for unfamiliar, non-specific movements is less clear. Here, we examine this using a meta-analysis. #OleMissMuscle
December 19, 2025 at 1:10 PM
Task-specific strength gains reflect increases measured in the same movements that were trained and are greatest when training (“practicing”) with heavier loads. Whether the same is true for unfamiliar, non-specific movements is less clear. Here, we examine this using a meta-analysis. #OleMissMuscle
Recent paper from #OleMissMuscle where we evaluate whether a historical control group can substitute for a time-matched, non-exercise control in assessing resistance training-induced changes in 1RM strength and response variability.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Using historical controls to evaluate resistance training-induced strength adaptations: Does history repeat itself?
To determine whether a historical control group could appropriately quantify resistance training-induced changes in one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength and the magnitude of variability in trainin...
www.tandfonline.com
September 27, 2025 at 1:19 PM
Recent paper from #OleMissMuscle where we evaluate whether a historical control group can substitute for a time-matched, non-exercise control in assessing resistance training-induced changes in 1RM strength and response variability.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Reposted by William B. Hammert
🚨LEAD FEATURE ARTICLE🚨 November 2025✨
We are very excited to announce our lead feature article for the November 2025 by Lolli et al titled ‘Understanding Treatment Response Heterogeneity Using Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials: A Primer for Exercise and Nutrition Scientists’.
We are very excited to announce our lead feature article for the November 2025 by Lolli et al titled ‘Understanding Treatment Response Heterogeneity Using Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials: A Primer for Exercise and Nutrition Scientists’.
September 23, 2025 at 7:11 AM
🚨LEAD FEATURE ARTICLE🚨 November 2025✨
We are very excited to announce our lead feature article for the November 2025 by Lolli et al titled ‘Understanding Treatment Response Heterogeneity Using Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials: A Primer for Exercise and Nutrition Scientists’.
We are very excited to announce our lead feature article for the November 2025 by Lolli et al titled ‘Understanding Treatment Response Heterogeneity Using Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials: A Primer for Exercise and Nutrition Scientists’.
@jamessteeleii.bsky.social Dr. Steele, do you mind if I ask you a quick question about calculating 90% CI from an SDir?
April 18, 2025 at 12:38 AM
@jamessteeleii.bsky.social Dr. Steele, do you mind if I ask you a quick question about calculating 90% CI from an SDir?