@bmaus1090.bsky.social
It’s not this stat or that stat. It’s every stat. But it’s cool, I was having this same argument about Rodgers in 2009 and 2010. Take care.
December 8, 2025 at 1:12 AM
It’s not this stat or that stat. It’s every stat. But it’s cool, I was having this same argument about Rodgers in 2009 and 2010. Take care.
It’s completely fine to not like his game. That’s subjective and there’s plenty of good athletes I don’t enjoy watching.
But you said he’s “fine, not good”. And that’s objectively false by every single measure. He’s been a top 5 QB all year.
But you said he’s “fine, not good”. And that’s objectively false by every single measure. He’s been a top 5 QB all year.
December 8, 2025 at 1:05 AM
It’s completely fine to not like his game. That’s subjective and there’s plenty of good athletes I don’t enjoy watching.
But you said he’s “fine, not good”. And that’s objectively false by every single measure. He’s been a top 5 QB all year.
But you said he’s “fine, not good”. And that’s objectively false by every single measure. He’s been a top 5 QB all year.
Don’t trust a guy who consistently makes impact throws to make an impact throw. He’s got the 3rd best odds for MVP. I’m not sure what your eyes are seeing but it’s not reality
December 8, 2025 at 12:48 AM
Don’t trust a guy who consistently makes impact throws to make an impact throw. He’s got the 3rd best odds for MVP. I’m not sure what your eyes are seeing but it’s not reality
Reposted
That “say Drake” smile is gonna be in his nightmares for a very long time
February 10, 2025 at 1:38 AM
That “say Drake” smile is gonna be in his nightmares for a very long time
I get that. But turnovers are only 2-0 and Kam’s usage was higher. The o rating gap is essentially because of free throws, which to me doesn’t offset the huge gap in assists, rebounds and usage.
Obviously Stevie was incredible too but I just don’t see a real argument for Stevie here.
Obviously Stevie was incredible too but I just don’t see a real argument for Stevie here.
November 20, 2024 at 8:21 PM
I get that. But turnovers are only 2-0 and Kam’s usage was higher. The o rating gap is essentially because of free throws, which to me doesn’t offset the huge gap in assists, rebounds and usage.
Obviously Stevie was incredible too but I just don’t see a real argument for Stevie here.
Obviously Stevie was incredible too but I just don’t see a real argument for Stevie here.
genuinely asking, how’d you arrive at that conclusion? Kam was 7-12, Stevie 6-11. Had 4 more points than Kam but assists were 10 to 0 and rebounds were 13 to 2. Stevie was great too, but I don’t understand this one.
November 20, 2024 at 7:57 PM
genuinely asking, how’d you arrive at that conclusion? Kam was 7-12, Stevie 6-11. Had 4 more points than Kam but assists were 10 to 0 and rebounds were 13 to 2. Stevie was great too, but I don’t understand this one.