Megyn Kelly’s attempt to reframe Epstein’s abuse as “not pedophilia” because victims were 15 is disturbing. Fifteen is still a child. Language like this minimizes exploitation and shifts focus from survivors. Public figures must speak responsibly when addressing crimes against minors.

Megyn Kelly’s attempt to reframe Epstein’s abuse as “not pedophilia” because victims were 15 is disturbing. Fifteen is still a child. Language like this minimizes exploitation and shifts focus from survivors. Public figures must speak responsibly when addressing crimes against minors.

Megyn Kelly’s attempt to reframe Epstein’s abuse as “not pedophilia” because victims were 15 is disturbing. Fifteen is still a child. Language like this minimizes exploitation and shifts focus from survivors. Public figures must speak responsibly when addressing crimes against minors.

Megyn Kelly’s attempt to reframe Epstein’s abuse as “not pedophilia” because victims were 15 is disturbing. Fifteen is still a child. Language like this minimizes exploitation and shifts focus from survivors. Public figures must speak responsibly when addressing crimes against minors.

Megyn Kelly’s attempt to reframe Epstein’s abuse as “not pedophilia” because victims were 15 is disturbing. Fifteen is still a child. Language like this minimizes exploitation and shifts focus from survivors. Public figures must speak responsibly when addressing crimes against minors.

Megyn Kelly’s attempt to reframe Epstein’s abuse as “not pedophilia” because victims were 15 is disturbing. Fifteen is still a child. Language like this minimizes exploitation and shifts focus from survivors. Public figures must speak responsibly when addressing crimes against minors.

Megyn Kelly’s attempt to reframe Epstein’s abuse as “not pedophilia” because victims were 15 is disturbing. Fifteen is still a child. Language like this minimizes exploitation and shifts focus from survivors. Public figures must speak responsibly when addressing crimes against minors.

Megyn Kelly’s attempt to reframe Epstein’s abuse as “not pedophilia” because victims were 15 is disturbing. Fifteen is still a child. Language like this minimizes exploitation and shifts focus from survivors. Public figures must speak responsibly when addressing crimes against minors.

“Trump’s tactic of blaming only Democrats for Epstein’s web of connections isn’t just partisan—it’s suspicious. If you’re serious about justice, you investigate everyone, not just your political opponents. Selective outrage doesn’t clear your name—it amplifies your guilt.”

“Trump’s tactic of blaming only Democrats for Epstein’s web of connections isn’t just partisan—it’s suspicious. If you’re serious about justice, you investigate everyone, not just your political opponents. Selective outrage doesn’t clear your name—it amplifies your guilt.”

“Trump’s tactic of blaming only Democrats for Epstein’s web of connections isn’t just partisan—it’s suspicious. If you’re serious about justice, you investigate everyone, not just your political opponents. Selective outrage doesn’t clear your name—it amplifies your guilt.”

“Trump’s tactic of blaming only Democrats for Epstein’s web of connections isn’t just partisan—it’s suspicious. If you’re serious about justice, you investigate everyone, not just your political opponents. Selective outrage doesn’t clear your name—it amplifies your guilt.”

“Trump’s tactic of blaming only Democrats for Epstein’s web of connections isn’t just partisan—it’s suspicious. If you’re serious about justice, you investigate everyone, not just your political opponents. Selective outrage doesn’t clear your name—it amplifies your guilt.”

“Trump’s tactic of blaming only Democrats for Epstein’s web of connections isn’t just partisan—it’s suspicious. If you’re serious about justice, you investigate everyone, not just your political opponents. Selective outrage doesn’t clear your name—it amplifies your guilt.”