I mean, the actual quote is a lot more damning, but sure 🙂

That sort of sounds like you... *didn't* see it in Horses.

They failed to grasp the opportunity. Take advantage of the medium: proper linking, interactivity, user contributions (not just awful comments), etc. No excuse for them not doing so. The Guardian actually did some of this for a while, but they've sadly regressed to the lowest common slop of late.

Do they take requests? I really want them to do "hence why" next. I think there will be *many* more instances...

Newspapers are THE example of how to do online wrong. Rather than adapt to the medium, they just decided to shit out as much worthless content as possible, chasing numbers. Push out divisive nonsense, shove ads on top, profit... until everyone wakes up to this nonsense and you've destroyed yourself.

This works, but only if 75% is enough to pay your day-to-day expenses. Fortunately, if you're in the UK, the base threshold is fairly generous, so you can judge whether you'll owe any tax beforehand!

Trying to remember a post office scene... *maybe* there's one in the background of the village from the tea room?

What *isn't* the thing?

"without punctuation"? Challenge impossible.

Of course. My point was about the misuse of the term "algorithm" to *only* mean social media feed (algorithm).

How can people who are so stupid have so much power? I guess the president sets the precedent...

Stop using "algorithm" to mean "social media feed".

... an equal scope to other genres. "MB" is definitely an obscure term, it's pretty inaccessible.