You're, again, missing key points. But the bottom line is that we have an issue with cops in this country and this would weed out a lot of bad ones. If you're afraid to discharge your duties, you shouldn't be a cop. End of story.

I'd argue that domestic calls often get escalated by armed police showing up. You're also missing the fact that cops have more than guns at their disposal. Furthermore, most of the public's interaction with the police is through traffic stops or response to an accident scene.

You missed a key point where only probationary officers would be without firearms. If you're busting a meth lab or taking down a den of thieves there would still be armed officers and presumably an overfunded SWAT team to execute warrants.

You’re suggesting that the only reason most people obey the police is the fact they have a gun? Or that regular people would blow away an unarmed cop to get out of a traffic ticket? The fact is that most policing doesn’t require even the threat of a gun let alone an actual gun.

If I were in charge of cops for the day, I'd rewrite policy so that:
1. New cops do not carry firearms during their probationary period (3-5 years)
2. Cops can only carry firearms if they had a clean probationary period
3. Cops cannot be rehired by different agencies if fired for cause

kinda meal that makes you forget about the cold outside... but I don't think you are getting that much cold where you are.

Are the proceedings recorded?

This isn’t likely to work in an ecosystem of lies and propaganda. They’ll just keep saying that both sides take bribes even if it isn’t true.

City of brotherly love.