Can anyone point to a credible defence of this policy. As with a number of other seemingly inexplicable decisions Eg the invitation to the Israeli PM, there has to be behind the scenes influence of vested interests

I block the caller each time but they still keep coming. Why?

If you mean Fairfax, yes. This election Sportsbet suggesting Fairfax is a certainty to elect Ted O’Brien - makes me wonder what is going on up there.

Sportsbet suggesting no contest - lnp 1.03; independent 9.00; labour 23.00.

A more refined way of saying FAFO

Totally agree with this sentiment. But I am finding this site something of an echo chamber. However seeking to expand what I get runs the risk of being exposed to the type of comments that I left X to avoid.

I suggest it would not be easy for an interviewer to challenge doubtful statements during an interview. I remember Barrie Cassidy doing it brilliantly in an interview with Dutton years ago but there are not many Barrie Cassidy’s