Bridgette Dunlap
@bridgettedunlap.bsky.social
Mother, lawyer, columnist for the Missouri Independent.
Other words at KC Star, Pitch KC, Rolling Stone, Rewire, Atlantic, Slate, Ms & Bridgette has a memo.
Signal: https://signal.me/#eu/wRH1Qp6qqRzSpWwL5OkqUDLOQrJxnXi6aru2HOnLEkupJ8fkqEpHE6hwl00EwA9D
Other words at KC Star, Pitch KC, Rolling Stone, Rewire, Atlantic, Slate, Ms & Bridgette has a memo.
Signal: https://signal.me/#eu/wRH1Qp6qqRzSpWwL5OkqUDLOQrJxnXi6aru2HOnLEkupJ8fkqEpHE6hwl00EwA9D
nice. I’m gonna try to ride our air bud phase
November 25, 2025 at 3:31 PM
nice. I’m gonna try to ride our air bud phase
Is it good? I didn’t know I was a dog person until I got obsessed with the search and rescue dogs while volunteering at the Javitz center
November 25, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Is it good? I didn’t know I was a dog person until I got obsessed with the search and rescue dogs while volunteering at the Javitz center
Ah, the rule of law, those were the days.
November 18, 2025 at 9:44 PM
Ah, the rule of law, those were the days.
I called the RNC to confirm it was actually them.
November 18, 2025 at 5:09 PM
I called the RNC to confirm it was actually them.
Relationships are different, but boy would I be pissed if my husband took it upon himself to organize my closet. Which he would never do because he’s not presumptuous like that and doesn’t treat me like a child.
November 18, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Relationships are different, but boy would I be pissed if my husband took it upon himself to organize my closet. Which he would never do because he’s not presumptuous like that and doesn’t treat me like a child.
This. Don’t know if this is what happened here, but it has been giving me memories of how demoralizing it is to find out someone you thought was a champion of your work is just trying to date you.
November 16, 2025 at 3:59 PM
This. Don’t know if this is what happened here, but it has been giving me memories of how demoralizing it is to find out someone you thought was a champion of your work is just trying to date you.
RNC confirmed it was them. I asked why I received it and they said texts usually go to “people who voted for republicans or signed up for our lists” which does not describe me or others that I know got it. So I guess they bought a list from spammers? (Or got it from the state? 😬)
November 15, 2025 at 9:12 PM
RNC confirmed it was them. I asked why I received it and they said texts usually go to “people who voted for republicans or signed up for our lists” which does not describe me or others that I know got it. So I guess they bought a list from spammers? (Or got it from the state? 😬)
Reposted by Bridgette Dunlap
See also this misleading text I and probably thousands of others got yesterday that is meant to scare us into removing our signatures.
I think it might be illegal despite the carefully deceptive wording. But the RNC knows our AG won’t do anything
I think it might be illegal despite the carefully deceptive wording. But the RNC knows our AG won’t do anything
November 15, 2025 at 4:52 PM
See also this misleading text I and probably thousands of others got yesterday that is meant to scare us into removing our signatures.
I think it might be illegal despite the carefully deceptive wording. But the RNC knows our AG won’t do anything
I think it might be illegal despite the carefully deceptive wording. But the RNC knows our AG won’t do anything
See also this misleading text I and probably thousands of others got yesterday that is meant to scare us into removing our signatures.
I think it might be illegal despite the carefully deceptive wording. But the RNC knows our AG won’t do anything
I think it might be illegal despite the carefully deceptive wording. But the RNC knows our AG won’t do anything
November 15, 2025 at 4:52 PM
See also this misleading text I and probably thousands of others got yesterday that is meant to scare us into removing our signatures.
I think it might be illegal despite the carefully deceptive wording. But the RNC knows our AG won’t do anything
I think it might be illegal despite the carefully deceptive wording. But the RNC knows our AG won’t do anything
True, but it also seems too convenient to me that this victim is Giuffre.
On the other hand, if it wasn’t her, why don’t democrats with knowledge just say it wasn’t her without revealing the actual victim?
On the other hand, if it wasn’t her, why don’t democrats with knowledge just say it wasn’t her without revealing the actual victim?
November 13, 2025 at 5:19 PM
True, but it also seems too convenient to me that this victim is Giuffre.
On the other hand, if it wasn’t her, why don’t democrats with knowledge just say it wasn’t her without revealing the actual victim?
On the other hand, if it wasn’t her, why don’t democrats with knowledge just say it wasn’t her without revealing the actual victim?
Why won’t Michael Wolff just tell us what he knows?
November 13, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Why won’t Michael Wolff just tell us what he knows?
My bad. No need to google. Someone literally gave you the Wikipedia link above.
November 10, 2025 at 1:44 AM
My bad. No need to google. Someone literally gave you the Wikipedia link above.
I think you are not understanding. Google what “senior status” is. It’s different than retirement.
November 10, 2025 at 1:42 AM
I think you are not understanding. Google what “senior status” is. It’s different than retirement.
Yes, he did. And he says he’s going to dedicate himself to this, so presumably he’ll have a lot more to say about SCOTUS.
November 9, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Yes, he did. And he says he’s going to dedicate himself to this, so presumably he’ll have a lot more to say about SCOTUS.
If he didn’t have senior status, then yes, we would need him to serve into his 80s to avoid having his seat filled by Trump.
November 9, 2025 at 3:08 PM
If he didn’t have senior status, then yes, we would need him to serve into his 80s to avoid having his seat filled by Trump.