Brian Reed
@brihreed.bsky.social
540 followers 300 following 150 posts
Host of Question Everything from KCRW and Placement Theory: lnk.to/khCBOC Co-founder of Placement Theory Host of S-Town; Co-Host of The Trojan Horse Affair (Serial/New York Times); formerly senior producer at This American Life Signal: brihreed.45
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
brihreed.bsky.social
We are excited to be nominated for a Signal Award in three categories! Please vote for us, it helps the show. Go to vote.signalaward.com, search for “Placement Theory”, and vote for the three entries that pop up. Thank you!
brihreed.bsky.social
We are excited to be nominated for a Signal Award in three categories! Please vote for us, it helps the show. Go to vote.signalaward.com, search for “Placement Theory”, and vote for the three entries that pop up. Thank you!
brihreed.bsky.social
I found the response the BBC gave to our reporting about the Gaza documentary they killed to be incredible. In what world does the BBC not have a choice about what to run or not? In what world does it not have a choice over what its own editorial and ethical policies are?

Link ⬇️
brihreed.bsky.social
Yes to be clear, I'm not proposing government fines or regulation. That, to me, is the elegance of this solution. It's *removing* a regulation -- by stripping away a special subsidy the govt has bestowed upon only tech platforms -- and forcing their business models to adapt to market forces.
brihreed.bsky.social
Their business models are built on this special liability shield in Section 230 that no other industry gets. We've seen the business model is harmful. Let's bring them on an even playing field with all other media.
brihreed.bsky.social
It's not a fine. They'd be exposed to lawsuits from those who are defamed. Most lies are not defamatory -- 99% of lies are protected speech. But for defamatory lies -- like against Dominion Voting Systems Sandy Hook families -- those who were defa med could sue the platforms. Right now, they can't.
brihreed.bsky.social
My point is: they are doing that already. They're identifying things that are false and incendiary and boosting those things. With no liability. I think the liability should be imposed for algorithmic boosting. They shouldn't censor posts. But not everybody is entitled to massive boosting.
brihreed.bsky.social
As of this week we have a new social meida app, Sora, from OpenAI, which makes powerful AI generated video in seconds and spreads it around. They need the normal liability other content creators and media companies have to force any kind of accountability.
brihreed.bsky.social
We know their algorithms are already identifying content for aspects of it that are harmful to boost it. Let's disincentivize that.
brihreed.bsky.social
Yeah, if social media as we know it went away, would that be such a bad thing? But assuming their business is so strong they're motivated to find a way to keep their model, they don't need to arbitrate the truth of every post. How about just NOT algorithmically boosting lies to travel 6X faster?
brihreed.bsky.social
Don’t forget the Ellisons getting in on TikTok too — which because of Section 230 is immune from lawsuits! That’s where I think we need to focus and can make an impact.
brihreed.bsky.social
No. We need to strip the special immunity social media companies have from lawsuits (for defamation, etc). Put them on an even playing field with the rest of the market, and expose their business models to the same liability as everyone else. Not govt intervention or regulation.
brihreed.bsky.social
This is a nightmare. Not that traditional media needs to be *the* trusted source of news, but knowing the alternative information ecosystem people are turning to, there needs to be a systemic effort to disincentivize lies there and incentivize facts.

(h/t @oliverdarcy.bsky.social at Status)
brihreed.bsky.social
Think about the role of these quotations marks in this reporting on this news about reporting, and what it says about the state of reality right now.
brihreed.bsky.social
On this week’s Question Everything … the urgent film about Gaza the BBC wouldn’t air.

🔗🔗Links to listen in the thread📻⬇️
brihreed.bsky.social
Anyone working at CBS News who wants to share anything about what's going on around you in the coming days and weeks (or months) -- totally anonymously -- my signal is open: brihreed.45
brihreed.bsky.social
"Question Everything" is back with a new mission -- and a bigger fact-checking budget. (Thanks @kcrw.com 🙏🏼)

Tomorrow.
brihreed.bsky.social
Well we very much agree on this.
brihreed.bsky.social
I think it made sense at the time and did for a while.
Specifically, I think a platform that's using powerful algorithms to assess content, boost and target posts to audiences on a massive scale, and raking in profit as a result, should bear liability as a publisher. Those are editorial decisions.