brooklynpsu.bsky.social
@brooklynpsu.bsky.social
I think he's talking about nationalization under Pérez and Chavez.
December 17, 2025 at 12:40 AM
I think he's talking about nationalization under Pérez and Chavez.
Same as how they love “America” but hate its cities, half of the people who live here, its founding principles, its history of social progress, its constitutional law, etc.
December 13, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Same as how they love “America” but hate its cities, half of the people who live here, its founding principles, its history of social progress, its constitutional law, etc.
I demand Trump bring Ho, Rao, Duncan, and Kacsmaryk to the White House when he reveals his pick. I want all their faces in little boxes, Academy Awards style, so I can do this...
a picture of ralph and lisa from the simpsons
ALT: a picture of ralph and lisa from the simpsons
media.tenor.com
December 11, 2025 at 9:18 PM
I demand Trump bring Ho, Rao, Duncan, and Kacsmaryk to the White House when he reveals his pick. I want all their faces in little boxes, Academy Awards style, so I can do this...
I'm a lawyer and I don't own my hands anymore because of the Constitutional right to an attorney. It's very sad.
December 11, 2025 at 7:08 PM
I'm a lawyer and I don't own my hands anymore because of the Constitutional right to an attorney. It's very sad.
"I'm not an X, that's why I went to law school! Haha"
[Proceeds to pretend to be an X]
[Proceeds to pretend to be an X]
December 10, 2025 at 7:26 PM
"I'm not an X, that's why I went to law school! Haha"
[Proceeds to pretend to be an X]
[Proceeds to pretend to be an X]
Incredible stuff from Josh: "Of course, the likely response is that the most important role of the courts is to ensure federal law is complied with. Yes and no."
December 9, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Incredible stuff from Josh: "Of course, the likely response is that the most important role of the courts is to ensure federal law is complied with. Yes and no."
Daniel Jones and Jayden Daniels were starting for me this week.
Just need AJ Brown to score 47 fantasy points to salvage it. 14 receptions, 200+ yards receiving, and 3 TDs (with two 40+ yards) should get me there.
Just need AJ Brown to score 47 fantasy points to salvage it. 14 receptions, 200+ yards receiving, and 3 TDs (with two 40+ yards) should get me there.
December 8, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Daniel Jones and Jayden Daniels were starting for me this week.
Just need AJ Brown to score 47 fantasy points to salvage it. 14 receptions, 200+ yards receiving, and 3 TDs (with two 40+ yards) should get me there.
Just need AJ Brown to score 47 fantasy points to salvage it. 14 receptions, 200+ yards receiving, and 3 TDs (with two 40+ yards) should get me there.
I think Kavanaugh revealed their strategy in today's oral arguments: "For my friends, Unitary Executive Theory; for my enemies, the Major Questions Doctrine."
December 8, 2025 at 5:51 PM
I think Kavanaugh revealed their strategy in today's oral arguments: "For my friends, Unitary Executive Theory; for my enemies, the Major Questions Doctrine."
“How committed are you to common sense, bipartisan solutions?”
December 8, 2025 at 1:57 PM
“How committed are you to common sense, bipartisan solutions?”
“Bound for the United States” like they’re giant boxes that say “Caution: Drugs Inside. Destination: United States” on the outside.
December 4, 2025 at 9:12 PM
“Bound for the United States” like they’re giant boxes that say “Caution: Drugs Inside. Destination: United States” on the outside.
You'd know better than me, but I'm guessing this is targeted at House progressives. I believe the impeachment motion is privileged and so any of them could bring it up. Jeffries is staking a position to try to prevent that b/c "moderate" Dems are saying/believe it would be a tough vote for them.
December 2, 2025 at 1:28 AM
You'd know better than me, but I'm guessing this is targeted at House progressives. I believe the impeachment motion is privileged and so any of them could bring it up. Jeffries is staking a position to try to prevent that b/c "moderate" Dems are saying/believe it would be a tough vote for them.
According to Jeffries there is literally zero value in a potential "GOP Votes to Protect War Criminal from Accountability" news cycle. He can't sincerely think that, right?
December 2, 2025 at 1:13 AM
According to Jeffries there is literally zero value in a potential "GOP Votes to Protect War Criminal from Accountability" news cycle. He can't sincerely think that, right?
I’m no political strategist, but having 50% of your message be about mollify billionaires seems like a bad plan.
November 30, 2025 at 4:49 PM
I’m no political strategist, but having 50% of your message be about mollify billionaires seems like a bad plan.
Would there be a dormant Commerce Clause issue with a corporate exit tax?
November 26, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Would there be a dormant Commerce Clause issue with a corporate exit tax?
I have a feeling this has less to do with Trump's love of the buddy-cop franchise and more to do with his no-sex-pest-left-behind "moral" code (see Ratner, Brett).
November 25, 2025 at 7:03 PM
I have a feeling this has less to do with Trump's love of the buddy-cop franchise and more to do with his no-sex-pest-left-behind "moral" code (see Ratner, Brett).
Does it appear they’re complying with IRS rules? Like are they having you complete tax paperwork (W9 or W8-BEN if not based in US)? Processing payments to people all over the world seems like an absolute nightmare and I would not surprise me in the least if Elon just ignored the rules.
November 24, 2025 at 2:19 AM
Does it appear they’re complying with IRS rules? Like are they having you complete tax paperwork (W9 or W8-BEN if not based in US)? Processing payments to people all over the world seems like an absolute nightmare and I would not surprise me in the least if Elon just ignored the rules.
Lamborghini Wigglesworth? Is he of the New Hampshire Wigglesworthes?
November 17, 2025 at 11:56 PM
Lamborghini Wigglesworth? Is he of the New Hampshire Wigglesworthes?
Also, if the issue is Trump/GOP refusal to compromise with Democrats, then why wasn’t that the message? The demand should have been simple: “You want our votes, then earn them. We’re not a rubber stamp. We represent hundreds of millions of Americans who deserve a seat at the table. Let’s negotiate.”
November 12, 2025 at 3:22 AM
Also, if the issue is Trump/GOP refusal to compromise with Democrats, then why wasn’t that the message? The demand should have been simple: “You want our votes, then earn them. We’re not a rubber stamp. We represent hundreds of millions of Americans who deserve a seat at the table. Let’s negotiate.”
Honestly this take (“You don’t understand; Trump was never going to negotiate!”) is infuriating because (I) it’s almost certainly being pushed by the Cave Caucus and (ii) these people constantly lecture progressive about their cynicism re: Republicans obstinacy & the need for bipartisan solutions
November 12, 2025 at 3:19 AM
Honestly this take (“You don’t understand; Trump was never going to negotiate!”) is infuriating because (I) it’s almost certainly being pushed by the Cave Caucus and (ii) these people constantly lecture progressive about their cynicism re: Republicans obstinacy & the need for bipartisan solutions
