Mark Thakkar
banner
brunellus.com
Mark Thakkar
@brunellus.com
Medieval Latinist · Postdoc in the History of Maths, Logic and Philosophy, working on Cardano, the impossible and the medievals: https://i2erc.wordpress.com
You may also find it useful to add filter=0 (no removal of similar results) and/or pws=0 (no attempt to personalize results).
January 15, 2026 at 12:06 PM
Happily you can still force Google to treat you like an adult. How you make this the default will vary by browser, but the basic point is that the search URL should include the parameters udm=14 (no “AI”), nfpr=1 (no autocorrect) and/or tbs=li:1 (no variant forms): www.dedoimedo.com/computers/go...
Google search without AI plus custom Firefox search engine
Guide showing how to use Google without AI Overview via specific search parameters, how to create a custom search engine entry in Firefox, and a bit more
www.dedoimedo.com
January 15, 2026 at 12:02 PM
Reposted by Mark Thakkar
The German Research Foundation, possibly the most important funding body for academic research in Germany, is now not only allowing the use of AI to write applications, they‘ll also allow it to evaluate said applications. Only prerequisite is that one makes this transparent. It‘s a farce.
January 11, 2026 at 7:19 PM
Never mind the balls, it’s the brains I’m worried about!
January 12, 2026 at 10:20 AM
A subtweet?
January 9, 2026 at 10:59 AM
Hope it went better than the subheadings suggest!
January 8, 2026 at 10:17 AM
The kind of interview only a passer can pass?
January 7, 2026 at 10:12 PM
PS. Stotz has something about this (likewise with caveats) in vol. 4 pp. 260f. §18.3 and §18.5 (Nominale Kategorien: Zur Kasuslehre: Ablativ: Der Ablativ anstelle anderer Kasus).
January 7, 2026 at 8:51 PM
Which isn’t to say it couldn’t have been authorial – just that the phenomenon was probably not as extensive as the TLL section might make it look (which wasn’t that much in the first place, given the length of the entry as a whole) and that it wouldn’t be outrageous to dismiss it as a lapsus calami.
January 7, 2026 at 8:39 PM
I see that they describe these at the start of the section as “exempla minus certa, sc. suspecta propter m mobile” (the idea presumably being that an abbreviated ‘-m’ might have been accidentally omitted). The “exempla certiora” are also often explicable on other grounds or contradicted by vv. ll.
January 7, 2026 at 8:32 PM
I bet Dr Gerard Cheshire can!
January 7, 2026 at 5:23 PM
This is about handwriting rather than script, but it always bears repeating: Vat. lat. 9850 f. 3v has a note asking for someone who can read Aquinas’s scrawl: “procuretur si posset inveniri aliquis qui sciret legere istam litteram, quia est de littera fratris Thome”: digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Vat...
DigiVatLib
digi.vatlib.it
January 7, 2026 at 5:09 PM
Explanation of ‘Chortlemuffin’ for anyone who needs it: bsky.app/profile/sonj...
Am about to lift the following from a thread I did once in the Olim Bird Place, but if I leave a legacy behind, please let it be the legacy of coining the term The Chortlemuffin effect. The Chortlemuffin Effect describes a citational chain leading to bullshit. /1
January 6, 2026 at 5:42 PM
Richard’s brother? (I was very fond of his Busy, Busy World.)
January 5, 2026 at 2:30 PM
I’m no expert, but I do spend a lot of time in the kiddy section of bookshops in England and the children’s classics subsection will usually have either Over Sea, Under Stone or The Dark is Rising. Very occasionally Greenwitch, practically never beyond. Seems there’s still a market but it’s limited.
January 2, 2026 at 10:16 AM