Writes about systems that break people and people who break systems.
When did you first notice your feed felt... off? Like you were scrolling through a content factory instead of a community?
I'm genuinely curious when it all tipped over for you.
When did you first notice your feed felt... off? Like you were scrolling through a content factory instead of a community?
I'm genuinely curious when it all tipped over for you.
The fine print is always the story.
The fine print is always the story.
Platform promises democratization
Algorithm rewards volume
Bots and farms exploit the gap
Platform profits from the chaos
Policy "crackdown" targets symptoms, not incentives
Rinse. Repeat.
Platform promises democratization
Algorithm rewards volume
Bots and farms exploit the gap
Platform profits from the chaos
Policy "crackdown" targets symptoms, not incentives
Rinse. Repeat.
Its definition: "AI-produced low-quality digital content made in quantity."
We needed a new word because the old ones—spam, junk, noise—didn't capture the industrial scale of what's happening.
Its definition: "AI-produced low-quality digital content made in quantity."
We needed a new word because the old ones—spam, junk, noise—didn't capture the industrial scale of what's happening.
BetterUp Labs calls it an "invisible tax" because someone downstream always has to clean it up.
AI doesn't remove work. It moves work.
BetterUp Labs calls it an "invisible tax" because someone downstream always has to clean it up.
AI doesn't remove work. It moves work.
Zuckerberg on their Q3 2025 call: improvements in recommendation systems "will become even more leveraged as the volume of AI-created content grows."
Translation: slop is a feature, not a bug. It keeps feeds "fresh" for free.
Zuckerberg on their Q3 2025 call: improvements in recommendation systems "will become even more leveraged as the volume of AI-created content grows."
Translation: slop is a feature, not a bug. It keeps feeds "fresh" for free.
Sounds tough, right?
Except they still host it. Still serve it. Still collect ad revenue when you accidentally watch it.
The policy targets creators. Not the system that rewards them.
Sounds tough, right?
Except they still host it. Still serve it. Still collect ad revenue when you accidentally watch it.
The policy targets creators. Not the system that rewards them.
* Content creation = nearly free (AI handles it)
* Content review = expensive (humans required)
* Engagement = money
So platforms optimize for volume. Quality is someone else's problem. Usually yours.
* Content creation = nearly free (AI handles it)
* Content review = expensive (humans required)
* Engagement = money
So platforms optimize for volume. Quality is someone else's problem. Usually yours.
One Indian channel running AI-generated monkey videos earns $4.25 million a year.
Meanwhile, human documentarians struggle to break even.
The platform isn't broken. It's working exactly as designed.
One Indian channel running AI-generated monkey videos earns $4.25 million a year.
Meanwhile, human documentarians struggle to break even.
The platform isn't broken. It's working exactly as designed.
Get a warrant, arrest that person.
But mass raids that sweep up kids at schools and detain citizens? That’s not targeted law enforcement. That’s terrorizing entire communities.
There’s a huge difference between those approaches.
Get a warrant, arrest that person.
But mass raids that sweep up kids at schools and detain citizens? That’s not targeted law enforcement. That’s terrorizing entire communities.
There’s a huge difference between those approaches.
Anyone heading there: Haitian Community Help & Support Center and G92 coalition are coordinating. Document everything.
Anyone heading there: Haitian Community Help & Support Center and G92 coalition are coordinating. Document everything.
Also billionaires: fires 30,000 people to make AI
The abundance is arriving any minute now, I'm sure.
Also billionaires: fires 30,000 people to make AI
The abundance is arriving any minute now, I'm sure.