Bobby Tromm
@btromm.bsky.social
looking back on Chalmer's famous, "Facing up to the problem of consciousness" (consc.net/papers/facin...)
If we examine the landscape of c-sci today, it appears to be largely the same, except theories that actually address consciousness are considered pseudoscience.
If we examine the landscape of c-sci today, it appears to be largely the same, except theories that actually address consciousness are considered pseudoscience.
consc.net
April 25, 2025 at 11:29 AM
looking back on Chalmer's famous, "Facing up to the problem of consciousness" (consc.net/papers/facin...)
If we examine the landscape of c-sci today, it appears to be largely the same, except theories that actually address consciousness are considered pseudoscience.
If we examine the landscape of c-sci today, it appears to be largely the same, except theories that actually address consciousness are considered pseudoscience.
from what i’ve seen, it typically refers to a specific subfield, centered around DMF/Hopf/Wilsan-Cowan/Stefanescu-Jirsa/etc models of whole-brain dynamics
the idea being for conditions like epilepsy/coma, in-silico “surgeries” can be done as proof-of-concept
the idea being for conditions like epilepsy/coma, in-silico “surgeries” can be done as proof-of-concept
April 9, 2025 at 9:39 AM
from what i’ve seen, it typically refers to a specific subfield, centered around DMF/Hopf/Wilsan-Cowan/Stefanescu-Jirsa/etc models of whole-brain dynamics
the idea being for conditions like epilepsy/coma, in-silico “surgeries” can be done as proof-of-concept
the idea being for conditions like epilepsy/coma, in-silico “surgeries” can be done as proof-of-concept
was hoping to find this! thank you for sharing <3
November 23, 2024 at 10:11 PM
was hoping to find this! thank you for sharing <3