ShakeyJake
banner
buttcrackbill.bsky.social
ShakeyJake
@buttcrackbill.bsky.social
Mountain biking piscator that likes space stuff (except space Karen)
I'm quite partial to pub quizzes, beer, sci-fi & horror movies and outdoors type stuff.
tbh if anything it's the 80s that lets them down. I can't think of anything previously unheard that they released as the Beatles during the 80s.
July 25, 2025 at 11:30 AM
The Beatles released 2 songs in the 90's. Free as a bird and real love. Granted they were a bit of a re-mash of older recordings by Lenon, but still.
July 24, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Happy birthday, don't look a day over 105 ya miserable old cunt!
July 6, 2025 at 9:07 PM
😂😂😂 And you have so much going on in life that you trawled through all my old posts, got duped by a comedy photoshop April fools joke and them still came back to reply?
Fuck me you're a special kind of pathetic. No wonder you voted for Starmer, fucking retard.
July 6, 2025 at 9:04 PM
In context for anyone else here, this was a light hearted April fools joke. Scouse got in a triggered rage and went through my profile like some creepy ass stalker, so they got the shit they deserve. Out of context I realise my reply makes me look like an asshole 😂
May 28, 2025 at 10:06 PM
Haha, imagine being so fucking stupid you can't spot an obviously photoshopped picture posted on April 1st...

Oh wait, you don't need to imagine do you? 😂
May 28, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Haha, the old "this person disagrees with me, so I'm going to call them stupid" trope huh? It's this sort of stupid bullshit from stuck up pricks like you that is handing Farage the next GE on a plate. Now I understand why my Tory mates think all guardian readers are twats...
May 28, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Yeah, because all those people that turned out voted against him didn't they. None of those record numbers came out to vote for him did they? Oh wait... no that's not right is it, because over 12 million of them voted for him, 3 million more than Starmer 😂
May 28, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Take the piss all you like, doesn't change the fact Corbs was more popular than Starmer. 😉
May 28, 2025 at 9:37 PM
Odd you should say that as it kind of is in part, it was you guys doing the smear campaign and back stabbing that you'd usually associate with the tories after all. And again I remind you, more people voted for the "hard left" than they did starmers reform lite. 😉
May 28, 2025 at 9:36 PM
lol, original! Where you get from, the brexit gammon playbook?

We ALL lost with the options we had in 2024, still make the most of it cus the shit is really going to hit the fan in 4 years when Mr Toad's grifting at the helm.
May 28, 2025 at 9:27 PM
I can see how it ended, we ended up with the worst GE options in living memory, and ended up with the dullard reform wannabe toolmakers son, because he was slightly less despised than Roland rat from wish.com
The potato would have been a better option.
May 28, 2025 at 9:22 PM
Not trying to avoid tax at all trying to clarify a grey area that the BBC doesn't make clear, which you'd know if you bothered to read it, rather than trying to dig up shit from my feed like a pathetic loser because you're in a triggered rage. 😂
May 28, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Yeah, with 3,169,202 votes more than Starmer, roughly a third more than Starmer managed to get total, against a much more despised and hated tory party. Starmer should have been getting 13m+ easy if he was remotely popular, instead he didn't even break 10m
May 28, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Not my messiah, and I forgot nothing, I've literally said he lost 2 elections with MORE votes than Starmer got, that's how truely shit the Starmer / Sunak option was.
May 28, 2025 at 9:04 PM
They didn't want to stop a labour government, they wanted to oust a tory one, that's the whole point, labour could have had a potato as leader and still won, probably with more votes 😂. Jesus fucking christ this isn't hard to grasp.
May 28, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Haha, touch a nerve with some facts did I? 😘
May 28, 2025 at 8:56 PM
Starmer didn't win, the tories lost, big difference.
Blair won a landslide victory in 97
Corbs had I think the 5th highest vote count in living memory despite losing.
Starmer effectively won due to disqualification, it's a hollow victory.
May 28, 2025 at 8:55 PM
That's not true, the tory voters loved Johnson at the time, many still do. They didn't implode until Johnson got ousted and replaced by Liz Truss who fucked everything up in a month and then replaced by wetwipe Sunak.

Also, the brexiters flooded to tories, and they had more numbers remember?
May 28, 2025 at 8:52 PM
Still got more votes though, because more people liked him. Starmer was handed a win on a plate by the tories and still managed to do terrible, so how about you wind your neck in luv 👍
May 28, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Yes, one of them being more people liked him and bothered to vote than they did for Starmer. It had EVERYTHING to do with Corbyn, you have to remember he was leader before the tories imploded, and while dealing with all the antisemitism bullshit and still got more votes than Starmer.
May 28, 2025 at 8:42 PM
Not the point, if you have two options that are so shit only 3 people bothered to vote, you wouldn't say the guy that got 2 votes and won was actually a good pick would you?
That's where we're at, like it or not Corbs was more popular than Starmer, the numbers don't lie.
May 28, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Because it's not true. The electorate rejected the tories, they didn't trust Starmer at all, he won by simply being the other option in a 2 party system. This isn't hard to grasp.
May 28, 2025 at 8:33 PM