Or rather, his point is that the CW saying “the message was wrong” is actually wrong.

Sure. It’s entirely hypothetical.

But his point that “the message was the problem” is wrong, when data shows the more who saw the message the more they liked it. Her internals issue by issue showed the same.

Can you imagine the Biden version of the coverage?

In a limited time, her messaging and campaign minimized that swing and was making up ground Biden lost. Perhaps with a campaign that hadn’t just gotten started, she might’ve won the competitive states and made others more competitive, or minimized the swing, which of course affects downballot races.

She would’ve had months more to roll out more plans, more message overall which could’ve helped in those 7 and beyond. And elsewhere she would’ve been present through primaries. *Building* a campaign starting in late July is not enough time, hence why it’s not a thing.

POTUS Kamala doing this to Indiana and Fox would lose their minds.

Exactly. I recall after the election her campaign folks pointing out she made bigger gains in the 7 states she competed in. The race being only 107 days meant she could only compete in those states. (Usually, where a primary can help.)

Somehow I doubt a Dem could tell people they’re wrong and prices are actually down shut up and just thank them