Carl
@carlwaring.bsky.social
PC geek and hospital radio presenter/imaging producer. OED: Woke = being aware or well-informed in a cultural sense = me. Also still on the other place with same @
The only other thing I have is this info, which collated from everything available online.
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
BBC News political coverage
A conversational AI system that listens, learns, and challenges
chatgpt.com
November 9, 2025 at 7:52 PM
The only other thing I have is this info, which collated from everything available online.
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
Their editorial guidelines are here. I know no more than this.
www.bbc.co.uk/editorialgui...
www.bbc.co.uk/editorialgui...
BBC Editorial Policy
www.bbc.co.uk
November 9, 2025 at 7:50 PM
Their editorial guidelines are here. I know no more than this.
www.bbc.co.uk/editorialgui...
www.bbc.co.uk/editorialgui...
Sorry for the misunderstanding. If research/a report into something doesn't take *all factors* into account then how the conclusion that research/report draws be accurate? (To clarify I am not questioning the report's validity. I'm sure it's very well-researcehd and accurate for what it is.)
November 9, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Sorry for the misunderstanding. If research/a report into something doesn't take *all factors* into account then how the conclusion that research/report draws be accurate? (To clarify I am not questioning the report's validity. I'm sure it's very well-researcehd and accurate for what it is.)
But without that knowledge, and taking it into account for this sort of report, doesn't that really invalidate the result as being inaccurate due to it not showing the whole picture?
November 9, 2025 at 5:02 PM
But without that knowledge, and taking it into account for this sort of report, doesn't that really invalidate the result as being inaccurate due to it not showing the whole picture?
Absolutely. I seem to remember there's a petition to that effect floating around somewhere.
November 9, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Absolutely. I seem to remember there's a petition to that effect floating around somewhere.
What they do, someone, somewhere will complain about it. Doesn't mean they shouldn't do it.
November 9, 2025 at 4:55 PM
What they do, someone, somewhere will complain about it. Doesn't mean they shouldn't do it.
See my earlier reply with regards to *perceptions* of (ie not actual) bias.
November 9, 2025 at 4:54 PM
See my earlier reply with regards to *perceptions* of (ie not actual) bias.
A lot of things may have changed since the 80s. Hardly a fair comparison.
November 9, 2025 at 4:53 PM
A lot of things may have changed since the 80s. Hardly a fair comparison.
No it really doesn't.
November 9, 2025 at 4:51 PM
No it really doesn't.
Did you reply to the wrong post here?!
November 9, 2025 at 4:51 PM
Did you reply to the wrong post here?!
Does this study take into account the "due impartiality" guidelines and editorial policy, etc. No. It only looks at the raw stats. It is, therefore, flawed and therfore useless.
November 9, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Does this study take into account the "due impartiality" guidelines and editorial policy, etc. No. It only looks at the raw stats. It is, therefore, flawed and therfore useless.
You are wrong. There IS due impartiality. What you are experiencing is perception of bias.
www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/r...
www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/r...
November 9, 2025 at 11:13 AM
You are wrong. There IS due impartiality. What you are experiencing is perception of bias.
www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/r...
www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/r...
Your lack of understanding is irrelevant. As I (and the BBC) have explained, it's not just about the polls. It's not *just* about any *one thing*. It's a combination of a number of factors.
November 9, 2025 at 7:08 AM
Your lack of understanding is irrelevant. As I (and the BBC) have explained, it's not just about the polls. It's not *just* about any *one thing*. It's a combination of a number of factors.
Just because you don't understand the concept of impartiality and guidelines doesn't mean they are "nonsense".
November 9, 2025 at 7:04 AM
Just because you don't understand the concept of impartiality and guidelines doesn't mean they are "nonsense".
But it's not about raw statistics. There are many factors involved in deciding what gets covered and what doesn't.
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
BBC News political coverage
A conversational AI system that listens, learns, and challenges
chatgpt.com
November 8, 2025 at 9:56 PM
But it's not about raw statistics. There are many factors involved in deciding what gets covered and what doesn't.
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
The real reason #GirlsAloud aren't featured in #GirlbandsForever doc revealed 📺🤔
Why aren't Girls Aloud in BBC's Girlbands Forever documentary?
Following its premiere, viewers of the BBC's Girlbands Forever documentary have been left wondering one thing. Well, two, actually. Who said chunky highlights and bootcut jeans with a heel was cool, a...
www.officialcharts.com
November 8, 2025 at 12:56 PM
How TF is he an "MD"? Can anyone just call themselves that? I assumed one had to be qualified?! 🤷♂️
November 6, 2025 at 1:35 PM
How TF is he an "MD"? Can anyone just call themselves that? I assumed one had to be qualified?! 🤷♂️
Who reacted? Your comment makes no sense. But then nothing you've posted so far has made sense anyway so no change there then I guess 🤣
November 4, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Who reacted? Your comment makes no sense. But then nothing you've posted so far has made sense anyway so no change there then I guess 🤣
Reports are made, and items covered within their "due impartialty" guidelines. And even though how much anyone earns is completely and utterly irrelevant to anything, there is no BBC journalist earning £1.7m 🤣🤦♂️
November 4, 2025 at 5:33 PM
Reports are made, and items covered within their "due impartialty" guidelines. And even though how much anyone earns is completely and utterly irrelevant to anything, there is no BBC journalist earning £1.7m 🤣🤦♂️
Sorry but no, I am not wrong.
November 4, 2025 at 5:28 PM
Sorry but no, I am not wrong.
They do so because they have to. It's all worked out in their "due impartiality" and editorial guidelines of what they cover, when, why and how. And all this information is publically available. There's no mystery; and no "broad shift" in any direction.
November 4, 2025 at 5:02 PM
They do so because they have to. It's all worked out in their "due impartiality" and editorial guidelines of what they cover, when, why and how. And all this information is publically available. There's no mystery; and no "broad shift" in any direction.
Sorry but they still do with most people. There's not a damn thing they can do to make people believe what they don't want to believe.
November 4, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Sorry but they still do with most people. There's not a damn thing they can do to make people believe what they don't want to believe.
Of course they have, and do and would, assuming there newsworthy and nothing else of more import is happening.
November 3, 2025 at 7:38 PM
Of course they have, and do and would, assuming there newsworthy and nothing else of more import is happening.