Preferable to those that stare at you with distaste, or smirking.

Very sad!

But I think it's extremely risky and harsh to have this narrative of reporting that casts doubt on the whole report and ability for Murujuga to manage the rock art. Given we are all hoping for World Heritage status.

Was it involved DWER scientists in discussion about how the guidance values are presented asking for changes? If it was only for the nitrite graph, then why this one? Were the guidance values and information all presented in a table fairly? I do need to delve into the report more to work this out.

In general, I think the work has been conducted in an extremely scientifically rigorous manner. It's a worry that someone involved is concerned that this particular guidance line was removed from the graph but I think we need more information.

Ah they've just used a chunky circle and when they overlap it looks like scribble 😆

It's such a cringy process. Just have to harness the inner over confident white man.

The observed passive data looks like it's been drawn on with marker 🤔