in this case, asking the AI to summarize the book needs to consider that it can’t read the book, doesn’t read the book, and the results it gives are not condition by the content of the book. Like it simply can’t do what this claims it can do.

Would watch Every second.

"This man is a grifter and a thug," a resident arriving with his dog at the Kennedy Center shouted. "Where is Congress? Are you as upset as I am? This is a desecration of this building!"

If I was him, I'd probably blame my advisor who fabricated data and made it a lot harder for their students and coauthors to not get tainted, particularly after they had to retract a paper while on the market. But what if that person was white? Well, what do I know?

They never can see their arguments applying to themselves. If everything Shapiro says is true about Carlson, then it is also true about Shapiro, who built up Carlson and others previously. There was some introspection at the start, but the problem is always someone else for them.

One of the things that was consistently downplayed among the anti-alarmists was the pre-history to this, something that any of us who lived in Red rural areas would have found impossible to avoid. It wasn't (just) Trump. They'd be preparing for him...

Put it on the shirt:

Bruni
French
Douthat
Kristoff
Stephens
Klein, and
Friedman

I'm not defending the bible's use of the metaphor. We can argue that. I'm just saying this person who aspires to be a judge is either blinded by his ideology or illiterate.

The way this one belittles the Vice President is really something. Evidence that JD is utterly clueless.

I'm imagining a response to this that's a long-run joke like "The Aristocats" but the punch line is, "And they call it, The Academy", only instead of being gross things it's all the good things, like small group workshops, reading groups, and learning circles, and young people becoming wiser.