Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Cary Coglianese on regulatory excellence

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 14d

Prof. Cary Coglianese (@cary-coglianese.bsky.social) shared insights on regulatory excellence with leaders from 18 Australian regulators, highlighting integrity, competence, and engagement as central to building public trust. Watch his interview & slides: https://penncareylaw.news/3IcrQbG

International expert Professor Cary Coglianese shares practical insights on how integrity, engagement and performance can shape better regulation.

penncareylaw.news

2 1

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

Kleinman Center for Energy Policy @kleinmanenergy.bsky.social · 15d

PODCAST: Auditors promise integrity in carbon markets. New research suggests the reality is far more complicated. On Energy Policy Now, Cynthia Giles and Cary Coglianese explain why.

The Conflicted Role of Auditors in Carbon Markets - Kleinman Center for Energy Policy

Energy policy research from the University of Pennsylvania

kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu

Equal Protection Fight Looms Over EEOC’s Transgender Bias Shift

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · Sep 3

Professor Cary Coglianese (@cary-coglianese.bsky.social) speaks with @bloomberglaw.com about a lawsuit recently filed in Maryland federal court by FreeState Justice that accuses the federal government of depriving transgender workers of protections and processes afforded to cisgender workers.

The Trump EEOC’s retreat from transgender discrimination enforcement has set up an impending legal showdown over whether the agency is violating the constitutional rights of workers it’s tasked with p...

news.bloomberglaw.com

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

Regulation & Governance @reggovjournal.bsky.social · Sep 2

As we approach our 20th anniversary, we look back at an early contribution to Regulation & Governance, including this first editorial by the John Braithwaite, Cary Coglianese & David Levi-Faur that asked:

'Can regulation and governance make a difference?'

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...

Screenshot of the first paragraphs of first editorial in regulation & governance

Regulation and governance have become popular phenomena for social scientists to study and for good reason. Although redistributive, distributive and developmental policies still abound, the expanding part of governance is regulation. Indeed, few projects are more central to the social sciences than the study of regulation and regulatory governance. Regulation and the significant issues raised by it have become central to the work of social scientists from many disciplines – political science, economics, law, sociology, psychology, anthropology, history and others. Furthermore, the strong interest of other professional and scholarly communities, such as physicians, nutritionists, biologists, ecologists, geologists, pharmacists and chemists, makes regulatory issues even more central to scientists and practitioners who are perplexed by the demands for better, fairer, more efficient, and more participatory systems of governance.

We have established this journal to serve the needs of these varied professional and scholarly communities. We aim to provide a leading interdisciplinary platform for the study of regulation and its implications for governance. We seek to bridge and solidify discussions among a variety of relevant disciplines, serving the development of core theoretical and empirical insights in the study of regulation.

In this editorial introduction, we introduce the new journal first by offering an avowedly brief history of how interest in regulation has grown across the social science disciplines in the course of the last century. We then argue that the most recent buildup of that wave of research interest has coincided with a shift in political studies from an interest in government to governance. Finally, we distinguish regulation from governance and set out broadly, yet clearly, the intellectual agenda and vision for Regulation & Governance.

2 5

Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · Aug 30

To the laws mentioned in the op-ed— the APA and Evidence Act—might be added the Information Quality Act which aims at “ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including statistical information) disseminated by Federal agencies.”

3

Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · Aug 30

Important warning here about government “looking away from its responsibility to produce and validate evidence in favor of a return to policymaking through instinct, hunch and preference.”

Judicial Remedies After CASA | The Regulatory Review

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

The Warren Center for Network & Data Sciences @warrencenter.bsky.social · Aug 25

After the Supreme Court tamps down on nationwide injunctions, future pathways and questions still remain. Warren Center faculty affiliate Cary Coglianese writes about "Judicial Remedies After CASA." www.theregreview.org/2025/08/11/c...

After the Supreme Court tamps down on nationwide injunctions, future pathways and questions still remain.

Judicial Remedies After CASA | The Regulatory Review

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

The Regulatory Review @theregreview.bsky.social · Aug 21

In a recent essay, Cary Coglianese of Penn Carey Law contends that effective regulation demands ongoing vigilance and responsiveness rather than reliance on written codes alone. www.theregreview.org/2025/08/19/m...

2 1

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · Aug 20

In an op-ed for The Regulatory Review, coauthored by Matthew Lee Wiener, Professor Cary Coglianese examines the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v CASA eliminating nationwide injunctions, and he explores the legal questions and pathways that remain for litigants challenging national policies.

After the Supreme Court tamps down on nationwide injunctions, future pathways and questions still remain.

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

The Regulatory Review @theregreview.bsky.social · Aug 19

In a recent essay, Cary Coglianese of the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School argues that regulation must be understood as a verb—an ongoing process of vigilance and adaptation—rather than a static set of written rules. www.theregreview.org/2025/08/19/m...

3 5

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

The Warren Center for Network & Data Sciences @warrencenter.bsky.social · Aug 7

In this interview with the ANZSOG, Warren Center affiliate Cary Coglianese discusses challenges ahead for regulators, the threats and opportunities of AI, building/maintaining trust, and the value of bringing regulators from different sectors together. anzsog.edu.au/news/h...

Third-Party Auditing Cannot Guarantee Carbon Offset Credibility

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

Laurie Adkin, Ph.D. @laurieadkin.bsky.social · Aug 14

Coglianese, Cary and Giles, Cynthia, Third-Party Auditing Cannot Guarantee Carbon Offset Credibility (June 15, 2025). U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 25-28, Available at SSRN: ssrn.com/abstract=534... or dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn...

Many entities are pushing for carbon offsets to be part of the solution to climate change. The argument is that allowing organizations to pay others to reduce c

ssrn.com

Ad Law Reading Room: "Loper Bright's Disingenuity," by Coglianese and Froomkin - Yale Journal on Regulation

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

Dan Deacon @dtdeacon.bsky.social · Aug 15

Over at the Notice and Comment blog, today's Ad Law Reading Room entry is "Loper Bright's Disingenuity," by @cary-coglianese.bsky.social and @dfroomkin.bsky.social. Check it out! www.yalejreg.com/nc/ad-law-re...

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Loper Bright’s Disingenuity,” by Cary Coglianese and David Froomkin. Here is the abstract: Loper Bright prompted a tidal wave of reaction throughout the legal com...

www.yalejreg.com

9 18

Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · Aug 12

As The Regulatory Review wraps up its series on the Supreme Court’s latest term, my colleague, Matt Wiener, and I analyze one of the most significant decisions of the year: Trump v. CASA, which closed the door on federal courts’ use of national injunctions. www.theregreview.org/2025/08/11/c...

Judicial Remedies After CASA | The Regulatory Review

After the Supreme Court tamps down on nationwide injunctions, future pathways and questions still remain.

On the Need for Digital Regulators

1 1 1

Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · Aug 9

𝘕𝘦𝘸: “𝐎𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬.” Explores the need for digital regulators in two senses: Regulators "of" digital technologies, and regulators in all domains that work "with" the aid of digital technologies. Also, note the plural: "regulators." papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

<p><span>The growing digital economy brings increasing recognition of the need for digital regulators. This chapter considers two senses of the term “digital re

Rethinking Carbon Offset Audits

1 1

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

The Warren Center for Network & Data Sciences @warrencenter.bsky.social · Aug 5

In a new editorial published in Science, Warren Center faculty affiliate Cary Coglianese and co-author Cynthia Giles raise critical concerns about the ability of third-party auditing to restore the credibility of carbon offset markets. www.law.upenn.edu/li...

Penn Carey Law’s Cary Coglianese co-authors Science editorial exposing systemic flaws in offset verification.

www.law.upenn.edu

EU AI Act's Impact on Public Sector Use of AI

Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · Aug 2

𝘕𝘦𝘸: 𝐄𝐔 𝐀𝐈 𝐀𝐜𝐭'𝐬 𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐔𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐈 “Will AI systems take over governmental decision-making from elected officials? ... Will people in the future live under the rule of robotic overlords?” Questions from my foreword to a new book on the EU AI Act. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

As the rapid proliferation of innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) transforms major business sectors throughout the global economy, AI is also changing th

Loper Bright Enterprises One Year Later: The Practical Impact on Business, Consumers, and Federal Agencies | Blogs | Insights | Ballard Spahr

2 2 4

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

David Froomkin @dfroomkin.bsky.social · Jul 31

This is an excellent interview with my coauthor @cary-coglianese.bsky.social, where he talks among other things about our new paper on Loper Bright. Cary explains very clearly why we question the Court's claim to have overruled Chevron.

Our paper is posted here: papers.ssrn.com/abstract=537...

www.ballardspahr.com

3 4

Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · Aug 1

All agencies need a degree of autonomy to operate in a manner that advances public welfare--and autonomy matters crucially for those agencies whose mission is to gather evidence and report data, whether or not those agencies are formally independent as a legal matter. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

The Semi-Autonomous Administrative State

Conflicting views about presidential control of the administrative state have too long been characterized in terms of a debate over agency independence. But the

Third-Party Auditing Cannot Guarantee Carbon Offset Credibility

1 2 9

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

David Froomkin @dfroomkin.bsky.social · Jul 30

Loper Bright's Disingenuity, with @cary-coglianese.bsky.social, is forthcoming in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. We argue that the majority opinion in Loper Bright is empty and internally contradictory. It is an assertion of power rather than reason.

papers.ssrn.com/abstract=537...

1 15 35

Reposted by Cary Coglianese

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · Jul 18

Professor @cary-coglianese.bsky.social’s essay in Science draws on a recent report he coauthored with Cynthia Giles, entitled “Third-Party Auditing Cannot Guarantee Carbon Offset Credibility,” which is available online in the Penn Carey Law SSRN working paper series. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Many entities are pushing for carbon offsets to be part of the solution to climate change. The argument is that allowing organizations to pay others to reduce c

Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · Jul 15

Here’s the accompanying report, “Third-Party Auditing Cannot Guarantee Carbon Offset Credibility,” from a project in collaboration with Cynthia Giles: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....