I assign this piece :-) (or early versions of Ruhs and Baubock)

I read your piece as arguing that humanitarian/liberal ethics guide pro-im. advocacy and that communitarian ethics do not. To me the question is: can you study immigration without explicitly stating your ethical starting point (ESP)? If your answer is "No," then how would define your own ESP?

Hi @anagantman.bsky.social ! I read this piece with much interest! The paper mentions that the first 2 rounds involved "unfair" offers. Do you think your results would hold if you had a unC treatment condition with fair offers?

"Communautarisme" back then used to implicitly mean "anglo multiculturalism." Now it seems to mean "non-French" , a form of inclusion/exclusion rhetoric that smells far right IMHO, especially when mentioned alongside accusation of "islamisme".

This word has always been hard to pin down. In the 90s and 00s, it was used to describe ethnic enclaves like the ones that could be found in London and sometimes the return of a religious identity among second-gen Muslims (1/2)

Based on your diagnosis, what should be done in terms of training, publication incentives, tenure incentives to turn the ship?

Fine "encourage" . I meant it as "here is a piece of infrastructure that helps us collectively do good research" I have become a big-fan of PAPs *for experiments* and wish I treated my code better. But point taken: the experience of research as "we are in this together" is not a journal.

👍, a reviewer is a food critic, not a health &safety cop inspector. Once I asked for the code & my main thought was "they are a much better coder than me, I have no clue how this connects to the main text". Maybe requiring comments to code would help? (would improve how analysis is described too?)

@benansell.bsky.social just to make sure I follow: 1) replication and publishing them good but 2) "you are a bad person" replication bad? [this is just a two finger question :-)]

I personally wish we were having a debate on survey experiments...