Precies! Ik ben ooit voor de mooie verhalen van D66 gevallen en een paar keer op hen gestemd. Maar intussen weet ik het beter... Dit gezegd hebbend, heb ik liever Jetten als premier dan andere opties, maar wel met een flinke dosis expectation management.

I gave a talk on what I see as problematic in the EI research program (Robin saw a version of it too) that was attended by @lisabortolotti.com who then invited me to contribute to this SI. I think the two of you would be great contributors to it, hope you consider sending something in 😊

Have you seen this special issue? I think a paper developing the points you made in the post would be a great fit for it!
www.argumenta.org/cfp/the-epis...

Agreed! My favorite dialogue by Plato 🤩

Haven’t seen it yet 😬

To be clear, I'm very much in favor of philotainment! The fun can be deep, and the deep can be fun 😀

Cool! I'd love to hear what you think of the paper if/when you read it 😊

Brandom has been a major influence on my thinking for over 15 years. But as I became more interested in the entanglement of discursive practices with politics and power relations, I moved away from idealized approaches such as his GOGAR towards more 'realistic' accounts of argumentative processes.

->Netherlands. The case study illustrates in particular the limitations of Brandom’s account when it comes to problematizing the potentially exclusionary, status quo-affirming aspects of discursive practices of giving and asking for reasons."

->consideration in particular the cognitive limitations of human beings and the power relations underpinning discursive interactions. To illustrate the differences between the two approaches, I discuss a specific case study, namely the societal debates on the folk figure of “Black Pete” in the->

->in these practices. In this paper, I contrast Brandom’s account of the “game of giving and asking for reasons” with the conceptualization of argumentation as epistemic exchange (of reasons) that I have been developing in recent years. My account openly aims to be more realistic, taking into->

"Brandom’s inferentialism relies on a highly idealized account of discursive practices of giving and asking for reasons, which deviates considerably from concrete, real-life practices. In particular, it abstracts away features pertaining to politics and to the power relations among those involved->

I don’t think so, I love Eurovision! But it’s time for Israel not to be allowed to participate anymore.

At some point, the whole Eurovision thing won't be viable anymore, if a few more countries drop out. C'mon, other countries, grow a spine!

For once, the Netherlands making the right choice.

Done, thanks!

"For me, marriage is a form of state authority and coercion that I will not endorse through my participation."
As someone who has once partaken in the institution (now divorced), I feel the same way. Also, it's historically a patriarchal institution that cannot be fully unburdened from its history.